Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LIEBERMAN RECEIVES LETTER FROM HIS PARTY OF ONE...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
samq79 Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:18 AM
Original message
LIEBERMAN RECEIVES LETTER FROM HIS PARTY OF ONE...
Sorry if this has already been posted, but I thought it was something everyone should read...

From Daily KOS:


Senator Joseph Lieberman
One Constitution Plaza
7th Floor
Hartford, CT 06103

Senator Lieberman,

We, the members of the Connecticut for Lieberman Party, have passed the following goals and resolutions for our party at our meeting held on Thursday, January 18, 2007.

We call for you to:

Stop misleading Connecticut voters.
You stated one month before the last election that no one wants to bring the troops home more than Joe Lieberman, and then you called for a robust (at last count 35,000), substantial and sustained troop increase in Iraq.

Please refer to your own Wall Street Journal Op-Ed of November 29, 2005:

"If all goes well, I believe we can have a much smaller American military presence there by the end of 2006 or in 2007, but it is also likely that our presence will need to be significant in Iraq or nearby for years to come."

In your own ’10 point plan’ unveiled at the Veterans of Foreign Wars post in East Hampton on September 25, 2006 your own Point Six, called for continuing the strategy (instituted more than a year before) of embedding U.S. troops in Iraqi military units as a means of both facilitating the training and effectiveness of the Iraqis and permitting a drawdown of U.S. troop levels in Iraq. Point Six stated that increased embedding "should be done by redeploying existing troops, not adding new troops to the region."
· In your first television ad following the August primary, you stated that you were staying in the race "because I want to help end the war in Iraq."
· An October 11 press release from your campaign described the argument that you were "continuing to back President Bush's stay the course policy" in Iraq as "an out and out lie."
· In an October 16 debate, you claimed, "No one wants to end the war in Iraq more than I do."
· In a November 3 press conference, you stated, "None of us wants more war; certainly not me. ... I want to bring our troops home."
Senator Lieberman, CNN exit polls conducted in Connecticut after the election suggest that the Iraq was were not popular, and finding that 63 percent of voters support some form of withdrawal from Iraq.

Support the state's top election official, Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz’s proposed legislation requiring candidates to tell voters that they will run as an independent if they lose their party's primary.
We request that it be called the "Lieberman Law," and to prohibit major party candidates from running in the election after they lose a party primary. Our party also favors moving up the deadline for petitioning candidates to one month before the primaries.

If a major party candidate is thinking of petitioning if they lose the primary, and if CT persists in not adopting a law that prevents primary losers from running in the same election, voters, but also donors to candidates political parties investing expertise, donations, and volunteer time deserve to know that up front, fair and square, before they decide to support them.

Join the new Connecticut for Lieberman Party, a party you promised the Secretary of State that you would form, but did not join.
Lead the fight against President Bush’s assault on civil liberties and the U.S. Constitution.
Lead the fights against the surveillance of Connecticut citizens by state authorities, because they do not support Connecticut incumbents.
Come to a private meeting with the CFL Party, in order to participate in a discussion as to how you have let us down.
Follow through on his campaign promise to provide oversight by holding hearings and issuing subpoenas to FEMA and other Homeland Security officials and others with respect to their performance concerning Hurricane Katrina.
Last year, when you were running for re-election in Connecticut, you were a vocal critic of the administration’s handling of Katrina. You discussed the failure to turn over key records that could have shed light on internal White House deliberations about the hurricane, including those involving President Bush.

Your latest decision, as the new chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, to back away from the committee's Katrina probe is especially grievous.

We expect to hear from you promptly.

Yours,

John Orman
Connecticut for Lieberman Chair

Jonathan Kantrowitz
Connecticut for Lieberman Vice-Chair

Susan Henshaw
Connecticut for Lieberman Secretary

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey John, Jonathan and Susan! How does if feel to be punked?
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 10:24 AM by ShortnFiery
:eyes:

I know it's after the fact but it must be conveyed: MANY OF US TOLD YOU SO before the General Election! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, they weren't punked.
They usurped the "lieberman for CT" party after liebermen won because there was no real party.

They were not pro-lieberman then or now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What do the "chairman for Lieberman" titles mean, then, if they aren't pro-Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Look at post #6 below for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh, ok thanks for the correction.
I misunderstood. :blush: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. No problem.
I would've reacted to that had I not read about it elsewhere.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great post!
:party: WELCOME TO DU!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Yep, Joe Dino needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmmm...
Thanks a hell of a lot to...

John Orman
Connecticut for Lieberman Chair

Jonathan Kantrowitz
Connecticut for Lieberman Vice-Chair

Susan Henshaw
Connecticut for Lieberman Secretary

...for your help in getting this traitorous leprechaun re-elected.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DODI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Orman ran agains Lieberman. They did not help get him elected.
They worked against him.

. . John Orman, a political science professor at Fairfield University and a longtime outspoken Lieberman critic, contacted the Secretary of the State's office to legally join and then take over the abandoned party, which has a guaranteed ballot line in the next Senate election. Orman came to a Milford Howard Johnson hotel Thursday night with a tall agenda to make the party a soapbox for political theater and Lieberman criticism.

Number two on the agenda: A call for a "sore loser law," otherwise known as the "Lieberman Law," preventing Lieberman-style political party-hopping for losers of primaries.

http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2007/01/cfl_goes.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Thanks for the info, DODI.
I have to admit this went over my head; I haven't been keeping track of the goings-on in Conn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeDemocrat Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Subtlety is just lost on some folk
John Orman, Jonathan Kantrowitz, and Susan Henshaw do indeed deserve our thanks!:toast: After working to get Lamont elected, they gave up their Democrat registration to steal the cast aside hulk that Lieberman had used to get himself elected.:rofl: With the party rule changes (that they put in after the take over) they can maintain control of that :party: and use it in all sorts of creative ways, but cannot be activists in the regular Democratic party.

All good thinking people applaud their great sacrifice!!:applause: :bounce: :applause: :woohoo: :applause: :bounce: :applause:

:yourock: So Lieberman becomes a traitor to his fake party too! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Hmmm...
So,
this group is essentially
a
legitimate group of
knights-in-shining-armor who seek to
expose Lieberman's
repititious lies.

I see.

I'm a good thinker sometimes -- I really am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_for_Lieberman

<<< "himself the new chairman of the Connecticut for Lieberman Party. Orman had briefly challenged Lieberman for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination in 2006.<7><8>
Some of the new rules passed by the new party chairman include:
1.If you run under Connecticut for Lieberman, you must actually join our party.
2. The party will nominate people for office who have the last name of Lieberman and/or who are critics and opponents of Senator Lieberman.
3. If any CFL candidate loses our party's nomination in a primary, that candidate must bolt our party, form a new party and work to defeat our party's endorsed candidate.
4. We in the CFL intend to run the same candidate for three different jobs at the same time, ie. House, Senate and Governor.<9>
On January 3, 2007, Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz recognized Orman's takeover of the party. According to Ted Bromely, a state elections attorney who works for her office, "If someone wanted to challenge it, they'd have to go to court."<10>" >>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I like the rules... hope they keep publicizing that party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. #3 is a personal favorite.
Brilliant isn't it?

3. If any CFL candidate loses our party's nomination in a primary, that candidate must bolt our party, form a new party and work to defeat our party's endorsed candidate.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. a thorn the size of an oak tree in his side
I hope this gains traction like the fucking kiss float that followed the asshole around CT last year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Some of you all are mighty slow on the uptake
Posting without know what one is talking about makes us all look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I disagree. I can post all sorts of ignorance and it will change no one's impressions about me
I am truly the Teflon DUer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. This is one of the most brilliant political moves I've ever seen.
Lieberman sure didn't see this coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm not sure Lieberman would see an asteroid about to land on top of him.
This is brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allskinners Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It truly is!
How nice of him to run under a party he never even created. Now he gets this tossed at him. How sweet it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks for posting this
And welcome to DU !

I'm going to try to post a link in the CT forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. I Wonder If He'll Even Bother With A Reply....
He's such a turn-coat!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KenHodson Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's a good start
But really Lieberman needs weekly, correction, daily memoranda from the party. I think there would be a heckuva lot of people that would like to contribute time to write to their congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. I wonder if John, Jonathan, and Susan feel blood dripping from their hands
They really should :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Um...John, Jonathan and Susan were never pro-Lieberman
They usurped the bullshit "Connecticut for Lieberman Party" that Joe created to get around the traditional election process when he lost the Dem primary. Lieberman created this phantom "party" and John, Jonathan, and Susan made it real and made themselves the heads. They are punking Joe, not the other way around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Oops, I sit corrected
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. It's all right
Several other people upthread made the same mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. Can Connecticut have a recall election
like the one that plagued California with the aging action "hero"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is this serious?
This is not a joke right?

If this is true, then we are witnessing the further demise of Holy Joe.

I think he should just step aside and just give his seat to Ned Lamont. Just my opinion!



John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC