|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:13 PM Original message |
Biden: "Clean" comes from mother's saying, "clean as a whistle, sharp as a tack." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. "He hasn't got a criminal record " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyTheDog
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Joe, you are in a hole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Indeed. Stop SPEAKING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. He can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
75. One of Jane Austen's cardinal rules was not to take offense where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Jane Austen has never been my guide how to approach politics. But thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcos
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Which also poses the question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. yes, and so am I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Que? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. do you want to discuss the unethical things he did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I'm sure they have, as have probably every politician who has ever run for anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. but we're not discussing "every politician who has ever run for anything" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Fine, but the implication, at least what I'm feeling as an African American.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. you are responsible for your own feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Whatever you say, I don't want to spend my afternoon debating this, and.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. Don't feed the troll my friend... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. proudpoppy, the troll is you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. Doug Wilder, Alan Keyes, Shirley Chisholm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
63. Is selling favors for campaign contributions corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
67. Is selling favors for campaign cash corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
68. Is selling favors for campaign cash corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Perhaps Jackson's daughter was more common knowledge on the Hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Bull.Shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. any particular candidate you want to discuss, Mr. Bullshit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Shirley Chisholm , for one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. did she have a serious shot at the presidency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. No suh, I'se reakon not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I rest my case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
50. As, indeed, you well should. By your question regarding Ms Chisholm's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. To paraphrase Pirates of The Carribbean: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:41 AM Response to Reply #52 |
60. The thing that is so discouraging is that even here on an otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. Now THAT dynamic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Carol Mosely-Braun from 2004, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. already address. Very corrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Hmm. Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. New Republic, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. If such accusations mean that Moseley-Braun is dirty, Clinton and Edwards stink to high heaven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
55. You're answering all of these candidates with your interpretation of "clean," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. What about Shirley? Wasn't she "clean"? Take your time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
62. I think he was implying that in the past there have been many questionable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. T.S., Biden. Think before you open your big fat mouth; if you can't, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. "As a whistle"? So this is Biden's way of implying all black people whistle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. LOL! GOOD ONE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. Talk about damning with faint praise... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Odd that Obama doesn't feel this way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. What do you expect him to say for public consumption? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. You do realize that Obama's reaction isn't the most important... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. "Clean" in terms of political candidacy means no skeletons in the closet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. But that's what the Repukes want us to do!!! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
45. Right, I'm not saying it was the right thing to do. I'm only arguing it wasn't at all racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
66. I agree it wasn't racist. I also agree with your "regressive campaigning" observation. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
26. Pretty damn lame explanation, Biden. The context speaks for itself. Can't wait to see Daily Show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Clearly, every previous black candidate is more articulate than Joe Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
79. And cleaner too, not having plagiarized speeches, nor kissed *s ass: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. And didn't preside over the confirmation of Clarence Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
87. He sounds too inarticulate to be a good president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
29. good that his office has not commented anymore. Enough said.!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. From The Hotline: Obama's response to Biden when he called. I love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. they forgot to add the the rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. That's Biden talking, digging the hold deeper. Yes, Obama did know what he meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
36. Biden was definitely in artful in how he came across but anybody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. His implication that all previous black candidates were corrupt is worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I can only think of 3 (JJ, Rev. Al and Braun). All of them had there definite problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. First, they weren't the only three, second, they are just as clean as any other candidate, including |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Keys and Chrisholm were not viable. Don't know if Duglass was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Well, then that means that EVERY candidate is corrupt since they've all been accused at one time or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Indeed, Obama himself has had to disavow connections to Tony Rezko |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I was rebutting your argument about being "charged with corruption" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 05:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Chisolm in 72, Wilder in 92 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
80. When I was growing up in segregated Texas in the 50s "clean" was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
54. You're letting him off very, very easy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
51. Lightning in a jar . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
56. ALL white people in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
57. a month TOPS on Biden presidential bid...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. Was over yesterday, imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
58. *snark alert* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
69. Biden made a stupid, condescending statement, bordering on being racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
70. so it appears Biden himself isn't sure what he meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terip64
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
71. He needs to stop talking...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
73. As was so often pointed out to me re: Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
77. I'm sorry but WHO FUCKING CARES??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
78. Soo...it wasn't about soap, it was about criminality...all rightey then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
81. Subject: When I was growing up in segregated Texas in the 50s "clean" was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texaroo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
82. "Imply" versus "Infer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texaroo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
83. "Imply" versus "Infer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. I and many other blacks (and others) were offended by his comments and we are not "shallow, whiny- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texaroo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I have EVERY clue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. I neither implied nor inferred your intent. I merely commented on your characterization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texaroo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Have a great day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadmium
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
89. I took clean to mean free from baggage-- a fresh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texaroo
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Precisely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadmium
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. "Liberal" talk show The Young Turks were hitting him on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Fri Feb-02-07 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
93. so fresh and so new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC