1985 memoir about the war - you can't!
The closest you get is a book by Cecil B. Currey called Victory at Any Cost: The Genius of Viet Nam's Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap
There are a lot of Gaip books - some are pure fiction as others have shown - a few are still in print
19202 Giap, Vo Nguyen: BANNER OF PEOPLE'S WAR -1970
16034 Giap, Vo Nguyen: BIG VICTORY, GREAT TASK
22624 Giap, Vo Nguyen Gen.: DIEN BIEN PHU
22623 Giap, Gen.
: DIEN BIEN PHU. The Most Difficult Decision and Other Writing
But the 1996 interview that CNN carried is of more interest - to me - and says nothing about how he was about to surrender until Kerry opposed the war.
CAN WE SEND THE TRAITOR NORTH TO JAIL - OR AT LEAST OFF THE MEDIA!
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/11/interviews/giap/
The Americans sent advisers to each and every division in the South Vietnamese before 1965. In 1965, they started to commit big forces. We discussed among ourselves in the Politburo whether at that point it was ... a limited war. We decided that it was already a limited war. We discussed it in the Politburo that with America bringing in gigantic forces was to carry out a new campaign, with the American forces committed, it was not good for America but it would be very hard for us to fight. The struggle would be very fierce but we already concluded that we would win the war.
On fighting technologically superior U.S. forces:
When American combat forces were committed, it was a myth that we could not fight and win because they were so powerful. ... because of our courage and determination, together with wisdom, tactics and intelligence. During the attacks of B-52s, we shot down a few B-52s and captured documents. One of them was a order by the air command about the targets to be bombed in and around Hanoi and the positions of forces. Some were correct, some were wrong because of our deception . And our conclusion was that with such anti-air-power measures, the B-52 is not an effective way to fight. <snip>
On the Tet Offensive:
The Tet Offensive is a long story. ... It was our policy, drawn up by Ho Chi Minh, to make the Americans quit. Not to exterminate all Americans in Vietnam, to defeat them.
It could be said was a surprise attack which brought us a big victory. For a big battle we always figured out the objectives, the targets, so it was the main objective to destroy the forces and to obstruct the Americans from making war. But what was more important was to de-escalate the war -- because at that time the American were escalating the war -- and to start negotiations. So that was the key goal of that campaign. But of course, if we had gained more than that it would be better.
And the Americans had to back down and come to the negotiating table, because the war was not only moving into the cities, to dozens of cities and towns in South Vietnam, but also to the living rooms of Americans back home for some time. And that's why we could claim the achievement of the objective. <snip>
During the war everyone in the country would fight and they do so following the Vietnamese war theory. We have a theory that is different from that of the Russians and that of the Americans. The Americans did not understand that. They did not know or understand our nation; they did not know our war strategies. They could not win. How could they win? As our president said, there was nothing more precious than independence and freedom. We had the spirit that we would govern our own nation; we would rather sacrifice than be slaves. <snip>