http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/03/01/opinion/opinion/doc45e5fb7a1f4e7082752328.txtThink of it as revisionist politics. The Clintonistas and some of their chums in the elite media want you to think that Hillary Clinton actually got the better of Barack Obama in their recent scrape over the comments by movie/music mogul and Obama supporter David Geffen.
Excuse me, but what fight were they watching? Hillary never laid a glove on him. And Obama got in two sharp jabs — one that he served up himself and one delivered by his campaign spokesman, Robert Gibbs, who now is under fire from liberal bloggers because he is so effective at drawing blood from fellow Democrats.
At the very least, the Clintonistas seem to be hoping that the verbal shoving match has shattered the spell that Obama has had on much of the national media and that, from this point forward, he’ll be treated like any other candidate running for president.
Some members of the media are obediently picking up on that thread. Kate Zernike of The New York Times wrote that “Mr. Obama’s reputation for being above politics was soiled.” Her colleague, Adam Nagourney, insisted that Obama “seemed to acknowledge that he may have been outmaneuvered.” And Dan Balz of The Washington Post lamented that Obama “missed an opportunity to project the kind of campaign that he says he wants to project, which is to get away from the politics of polarization and personalization.”