Troops still lacking for Afghanistan

[babylonsister]

Troops still lacking for Afghanistan

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/apafghanistan070303/

By Lolita C. Baldor - The Associated Press
Posted : Saturday Mar 3, 2007 6:53:35 EST

WASHINGTON — Signs of a new spring offensive by Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan have begun to emerge, but NATO commanders are still short more than 1,000 combat troops despite repeated requests to allied nations, the top commander said March 2.

U.S. Gen. John Craddock told reporters that while the allies are winning more battles with insurgents, they are losing the counter-narcotics war, and more work and greater coordination is needed in the reconstruction effort.

Craddock said there has already been a slight increase in suicide attacks and roadside bombs — the beginnings of an expected increase in violence as the weather improves. And he said he is still short by as much as two battalions, largely combat units, despite recent commitments for about 7,000 additional troops there, including more than 3,500 from the U.S. A battalion is generally about 800 soldiers.

Craddock also said that 30 percent to 40 percent of the 25 provincial reconstruction teams working to rebuild the country do not have all the people they need, particularly State Department and agricultural experts. In those cases, he said the agencies either have no presence or not enough people on the teams, which number about 100 people.

more...