Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schoomaker new CO for Walter Reed, replaces Kiley

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:30 AM
Original message
Schoomaker new CO for Walter Reed, replaces Kiley
It's like musical generals!

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070303/REPOSITORY/703030348/1013/NEWS03

Army chief fired over Walter Reed
Bush vows inquiry into soldiers' care

By Michael Abramowitz and Steve Vogel
The Washington Post
March 03. 2007 8:00AM


Defense Secretary Robert Gates fired the Army secretary yesterday and President Bush vowed to investigate allegations of substandard treatment of wounded soldiers as his administration scrambled to contain fallout from the scandal over squalid housing and bureaucratic delays to outpatient care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C.

The Army also named Maj. Gen. Eric Schoomaker as the new commander for Walter Reed only a day after picking Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley as the temporary chief. Kiley's selection angered soldiers and family groups - and more importantly, Gates - because of their belief that he had been aware of problems at the hospital and done little to address them. Kiley is the current Army surgeon general and commanded Walter Reed until last August.

Gates made little secret of his dismay when he appeared before reporters yesterday to announce the resignation of Army Secretary Francis Harvey. Pentagon officials indicated Harvey had been forced to resign because Gates was angry with how the Army handled allegations of poor care detailed in a series of Washington Post stories. The facility's commander, Maj. Gen. George Weightman, was dismissed last week, and a captain and several lower level soldiers were reassigned.

"I am disappointed that some in the Army have not adequately appreciated the seriousness of the situation pertaining to outpatient care at Walter Reed," Gates said. "Some have shown too much defensiveness and have not shown enough focus on digging into and addressing the problems."

Later, in an interview, an emotional Harvey appeared both apologetic and defensive.


"It's inexcusable to have soldiers in that type of building," he said, explaining why he resigned.

But he also said the Post stories lacked balance.

"Where's the other side of the story?" he said, his voice rising. "Two articles in your paper have ruined the career of General Weightman, who is a very decent man, and then a captain . . . and the secretary of the Army. If that satisfies the populace, maybe this will stop further dismissals."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. What other side of the story?
"Lonely soldiers comforted by rodent pets"?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand all the hype!!!!
These people have been doing this since 1947,,,where have all you people been????? there are 20,000 homeless Veterans in America and the Number gets bigger everyday, Veterans have been dying from bad medical care since the last World War. Generals and Politic ans have not changed their attitudes only their names have changed. If it actually changed something I'd be happy, but it won't a month or 2 down the road and you will not find many who even remember, what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC