Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clintons push to create a 20-state super primary on Feb. 5, 2008...Funny

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:41 PM
Original message
Clintons push to create a 20-state super primary on Feb. 5, 2008...Funny
thing happened on the way, in their effort to make sure Hilliary got the nomination nailed down in one day.....


Clinton courts black support amid Obama surge

(excerpts)

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton personally lobbied Sellers, the son of 1960s civil rights activists, who defeated an incumbent six decades his senior last year.

But he's about to endorse Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and offered some friendly advice for the former first lady about winning the African-American vote.

"For her sake, she needs to get Bill Clinton out there a lot more," said Sellers, one of a half-dozen South Carolina politicians set to endorse Obama.

Her advisers had planned to hold Bill Clinton off the campaign trail until later in the race. But a stunning surge by Obama among black voters in recent weeks has made the former president's help "all the more pressing," according to a person close to the campaign.

..................
But longer-term problems loom, exacerbated by the Clintons' own push to create a 20-state super primary on Feb. 5, 2008. Many of the states scheduled to take part -- including Alabama, Mississippi and Florida and Georgia -- are dominated by black voters. That was fine in pre-Obama days, but now she's in for a fight against a racial native son.

"The Feb. 5 primary amplifies the Democratic vote in the South, and this is a region where blacks play a very, very strong role," said Joe Reed, a Democratic National Committee member who runs the influential Alabama Teachers Association.

It's not clear if Clinton needs to win a majority of African-American primary voters to take the nomination, but she has to fight, aides say. And that's why Bill Clinton -- famously mothballed by Al Gore in 2000 -- is coming back to center stage so quickly in the campaign.

"Hillary's in a battle and she needs her best artillery," said New York-based political consultant Hank Sheinkopf, who advises Alabama Democrats. "Bill's the best artillery."

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-ushill0304,0,7221890.story?coll=ny-top-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sick and tired of the Clintons
I wish they would both just go away. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am more tired or Republics. I wish they'd go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think they are power mongers
who don't really have any ideology. They just want power. Clinton was more than happy to go along with all kinds of right wing ideas and so is his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Learn2Swim Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. ladies and gents...
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 11:18 PM by Learn2Swim
^ we have a bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So am I
that's why I want the Clinton's to go away they are going to screw it up so the rethugs get back control plus another term in the Whitehouse. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm with you. Republicans wear me out. I'd rather have a Clinton,
or an Obama any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDP Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. I'd rather have anybody other than a Republican or a Clinton, and I won't be voting for either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's what it's all about. In America, you get to vote for who you want.
Whether your vote is counted, or not, is up for debate, but the appearance of choice is still there and I really enjoy that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDP Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. I wish the Clintons and the Republicans would go away. Do we have to have a Bush or a Clinton as
President? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. A classic case of "Be careful what you wish for."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. It will be interesting
I'm going to Selma tommorrow. I bet you anything that Hillary and Bill draw more black support than Obama.

Black Alabamians love Bill Clinton. They like Obama. But Clinton is right up there with FDR and MLK in many people's minds. Yes, he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with Raine. I am sick of the Clintons.
someone said any politican would pale standing next to Bill. I wonder if someone could do a picture of Obama and a picture of Bill and place them side by side and see how that theory holds up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. i think it'll be a close call...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Do you think that Selma will decide anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. President Gore better come into the race soon, if he is going to. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Presidential primaries/caucuses need to be regulated
A starting point for debate.

Split the country into 6 or 7 districts. States within those districts would be permitted to have their primary on a date restricted for the Super Primary. States in other districts could not have their primary on the same date. States that don't participate in the Super Primary could have their primary on a date after the Super Primary in their district that is also not on the same date as another district's Super Primary. Super Primaries would be held 2 or 3 weeks apart from each other.
It would take 3 to 4 1/2 months.



Except for Hawaii and Alaska districts would consist of states that would adjoin each other.

ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, DC, MD, NY, PA, VA, WV, OH, IN, MI, KY

TN, NC, SC, GA, FL, MS, AL

ND, SD, MN, IA, IL, WI, NB

KS, MO, OK, AR, LA, TX

CA, NV, UT, AZ, CO, NM

WA, OR, ID, MT, WY

AK, HI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, if you're going to limit the # of states that can hold a primary on a certain date.....
...I think it would be better to mandate that a state from each region is represented for each calendar date. Otherwise, some candidates would have a geographical advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not mandating... I prefaced it with this as a starting point for debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I just hate the idea of regional primaries
Why disenfranchise entire parts of the country in favor of one narrow region?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. One narrow region?
I don't see this as one narrow region. If anything this is nothing more than a small general election. An election that forces the candidates to campaign in all of the district instead of just 1 or 2 states. In one way it might be more cost effective for the candidates both transportation and media costs.

Someday we may end up with a national primary in May or June and the winners of the primaries would campaign for the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. If Bill Clinton had that type of a primary schedule facing him......
he would not have become President......from where I sit.

Ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. How do we know the Clintons have been pushing for this "super primary"?
Because Newsday says so?

Honestly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree, the super-primary
has little to do with the Clintons. Individual states have been pushing forward for their own reasons and egos. It looks like a horrible idea to me though. After NH on the 22nd there will be 20 states to campaign in, in only 14 days and candidates from both sides of the aisle competing for attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atranssexualgirl Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Hillary Clinton before the Iraq war and what she said!
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 04:16 PM by atranssexualgirl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_KEWUU33Lg

one comment from the Youtube

"Hillary did her research. Saddam had to be replaced with force. Oh now she was fooled. Now its Bushes war. Just the leadership we deserve if she gets elected. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Edwards
I think Hillary and Obama supporters will split the vote and Edwards will get the Nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC