Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe it's too late, but has anyone considered a recall election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:25 PM
Original message
Maybe it's too late, but has anyone considered a recall election?
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 09:27 PM by LearnedHand
I just keep thinking that impeachment might take too long, and doing nothing might leave our democracy in smoking ruins. Isn't there a mechanism for national recall election? How would it work, I wonder?

On edit: Needless to say, I'm talking about * and Darth Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no such thing at the presidential level.
Unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rats! I was afraid of that.
Wishful thinking, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too bad we do not have parliamentary form of government,
Prime Minister Bush would have failed a no confidence vote LONG ago, and the Dems would have been asked to form a government. I wonder who our figurehead president would be???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Duh. Bill Clinton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. There ought to be
and how valid were the Ohio results when the State of Ohio admitted the recount
was rigged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly
It's as if they broke ALL the rules and dared us to stop them. And we blinked. And we dissembled. And we shuffled our feet and stared at the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hey, here in Maryland, it was an obivious steal
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 09:47 PM by MissWaverly
I posted it on here at the time, fishy results in Baltimore, Here are some stats
that I kept at the time from 2004 election here in Maryland.

My humble statistics from no math whiz!
Kerry won with 1,334,493 which is a lead of only 309,790 in Maryland
Bush had 1,024,703
Here's why it is BS, these are registered voters who voted in the entire STATE of MARYLAND
1,340,778 78.89% of registered Dems voted
733,643 81.37% of registered Republicans voted
5,415 72.36% of registered Greens voted
16,182 67.39% of registered Libs voted
236 79.73% of registered Constitution party voted???
8 72.73% of registered Populists voted
299,529 68.52% of registered Independents voted

Results from Baltimore County
data is from the Baltimore County election summary
in Baltimore county (Diebold machines), it gets more interesting.
Bush 166,051 (46.98%) with 1,089 blank votes for prez
Kerry 182,474 (51.62%)
Mikulski (dem senator) 217,688 (62.72%)
C.J. Pipkin (rep challenger for sen) 124,092 (35.75%)
blank votes for senate race 7,498
US congress (2)
C.A. Ruppersberger (Dem) 96,723 (65.77%)
Jane Brooks (Rep) 46,236 (31.44%)
with blank votes of 7,447
Now you see that Bush consistently receives a higher percentage of the votes than the Republican challengers and in Baltimore County, not only are candidates not riding Bush's coattails, people are only voting republican at the top of the ticket and not bothering to vote at all further down on the ballot!


Now, I KNOW that the Democrats I talked to DID not vote for Bush, now even if every single Republican voted for Bush, of all the Independents in the entire state all but 8,469 would have had to vote for Bush for him to get that number of votes, I can tell you these are fake nos. We need to open up the machines! No more years.

http://www.elections.state.md.us/SBE_Election/turnout/t ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No doubt. The entire country saw widespread election fraud
Here in NM, there was an article saying we saw an 89% decrease (!!!111!!!) in minority and Native American undervoting after we went to paper ballots this last election. 'Nuff said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I wish we could have paper ballots too here in Maryland
esp. since the architect of the Help America Vote for Bush Act is now in the slammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. But after the House certifies the votes of the Electoral College,
it doesn't matter if the election was fraudulent or not. Isn't that amazing??

I suspect that if the republicans were the cheated against party, they woulD NEVER let it go. Nor should they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't recognize my own country anymore
How's the weather over there in the Great Smokeys? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, that's their excuse but I think there are ways around it
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 10:01 PM by MissWaverly
like undue influence, I have heard where people were threatened, if people were coerced
to certify the election results, they can not be legit, not in a democratic country.
Same way with the Supremes in 2000, if they were coerced, the election should be
declared "Null and Void" and appropriate steps taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC