Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A student's words, a candidate's struggle. In 1969 thesis, Clinton tackled radicalism tag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 07:24 AM
Original message
A student's words, a candidate's struggle. In 1969 thesis, Clinton tackled radicalism tag
By Michael Levenson, Globe Staff | March 4, 2007

In the acknowledgments, she jokes about not having a "loving wife" to thank for keeping the kids at bay while she wrote. On page 65, she decries the pervasiveness of racism and bigotry. And in the notes at the end, she talks about her decision to forgo a job for the rigors of law school.

But what is perhaps most striking about Hillary Rodham Clinton's senior thesis at Wellesley College is the way in which she grapples with such labels as radical and liberal and what they mean, questions she is wrestling with now as she runs for president.

The 92-page thesis, "There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model," explores the life and methods of Saul D. Alinsky , a firebrand activist who organized the poor in Chicago to lobby in the 1930s for better housing and social services.

During Clinton's tenure as first lady, the thesis was kept under lock and key in the Wellesley library, and its legend grew among conservatives. Many speculated the thesis, written in 1969, would prove the 21-year-old political science major was an extremist in the thrall of an avowed political radical.

But a closer look at the text, which has been available to the public since 2001, paints a more complex portrait. While Clinton defends Alinsky, she is also dispassionate, disappointed, and amused by his divisive methods and dogmatic ideology.

"Those who are anti-Clinton have made all kinds comments with reference to this thesis, which they haven't even read," said Alan H. Schechter , an emeritus professor of political science at Wellesley, who was one of Clinton's thesis advisers. "But if you take a look at it, you can see that it's quite nuanced."

More:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/03/04/a_students_words_a_candidates_struggle/?rss_id=Boston+Globe+--+City%2FRegion+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Senator Clinton--
--scares them to death. A strong, intelligent woman is the right-wing's boogeyman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sadly, it scares the population, too.
I have few beefs with HRC - I just don't think she can win the general election because we are, still, a very sexist society when it comes to the top jobs in this country.

How many female CEOs are there, for example? I mean, of major corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Still sexist for sure--
however, I think Sen. Clinton's major problem is going to be all the crap the right-wing can dig up, make up, exaggerate, etc. You're going to see stuff taken out of context from all of her writings and spun by Limbaugh, Hannity, et al so they can say, "Yep, um hm, see? She's a commie. She'll take away your guns, your property, and your kids." They'll revive their dead to vote against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like the "Scared Issue" is even across the board & CRAP,
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm



There will be CRAP about all of them. There are no perfect people.



In Hillary's case, most of it is old crap. There is new crap to be found about others, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC