Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is man whose mother is white and father black: called black?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:48 AM
Original message
Why is man whose mother is white and father black: called black?
Ex. Is Obama a black man?

Why isn't he a white man?

Do you have to have racial purity in order to be called white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Read Mark Twain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then read Ralph Ellison. . .
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. the technical term is mulatto n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. today's "technical" term is mixed
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. African Americans
If you speak to any African American with mix parents they will inform you that they are African American or Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Actually, that''s not precisely true
I know two young people of mixed heritage, and they identify neither as black or white. And they tell me they aren't the only ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. It's generational
The "one drop rule."

Half my ancestry is white but prior to ~1980s anyone with any "black" blood was considered black even when "light, bright, damned near white" in appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yep. It is generational. That's why I noted
they were young. And it's also cultural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. That's a generalization.
I am black and my wife is white. Some of our kids are obviously black, others are not. Also we travel a lot, right now living in Europe. Some think my kids are Portuguese, Spanish or Italian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. because when people see him they see a black man
he is judged and treated in society as a black man.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Depends who's answering.
In sub-saharan Africa he would probably be called "mixed" and Harold Ford Jnr (based on his appearance) would be called "white".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's the one-drop theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Which, if the "out of Africa" theory of human descent is true...
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 05:33 AM by Kutjara
...means we're all black. I for one, like the idea. I've been a pasty caucasian for way too long. Now I'm a pasty African American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. yup...
I sort of liken it to my little doggie girl, a blue merle Australian Shepherd/Lab mix with every color possible in her hair coat, including black, gray, white, red, yellow, brown--and every shade in between.

Such a strikingly beautiful little girlie and so perfect! (except for the fact there is no color I can wear that doesn't show that beautiful mix of shedding hair!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's a "Black thing," you wouldn't understand...
:evilgrin:

But seriously, I've heard the term started with the "Black Power" movement in the 1970's, but I think it was James Brown's song "Say It Loud: I'm Black And I'm Proud" that really brought the term into popular use.

It's hard to explain in just a few words, but you're right, because most American "Black" people have at least some "white blood" in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Because he looks black, and he is treated as a black by others.
Also he culturally aligns himself as a black, by choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Because he's phenotypically black, whereas say Derek Jeter is
more genotypically black (or mixed) but phenotypically white. Ish. Of course today they let you self-identify what race you most closely identify with, so...what does he say? What do people call Tiger Woods these days? He doesn't see himself as black even tho he's phenotypical, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. I prefer to call him human
. . . to distinguish him from the current occupant of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beingthere Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. very good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Here is the brutal truth
White men were having sex with their black slaves. Slave women were giving birth to babies that were of mixed blood. In order to sell their own children into slavery, they had to come up with some bizarre logic. So low and behold, the logic was if you had even a drop of black blood, you were a slave. So then white men could sell their children into slavery (have sex with their slave women and their white wives) and society did not look on them with horror.

Today, that logic still abounds in our society. Wasn't there a racist white Congressman who had sex with his black slave, I mean maid? Everyone considered his daughter a black woman. Yet she was half white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Brutal Logic
Virginia slave laws assigned the race of the child to that of the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Bingo! The historical truth.
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 01:06 PM by hawkowl88
This is the real explanation. Also, back in slavery days, if you had African ancestry and were not a slave and you appeared even slightly black, you had to carry papers on your person, proving you were a free man. Otherwise, you could be picked and as a runaway slave and sold. Once again it just comes down to money. In this case making money of the sale of humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. True--and, in this way, slaveowners
could own their own children. Another plus for them was that such children could never inherit--any estate would go only to "legitimate" children by their white wives, even if they had many more children by their slaves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. Because Obama calls himself black. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
23. Only in America. In any other country...
he would be called mixed race (by whatever term each country has for that). Only here does someone of mixed race have to "self-identify" or "pass". Obama probably had little choice in the matter since he looks black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. He would be mulatto in Latin America
Which, in a way, still makes him black, but at least recognizes his white side...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Latin America, especially Mexico, had many different "castas"
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 09:07 AM by Bridget Burke
Depending on the race or casta of the parents. Many rather charming paintings exist--showing the different family groups. www.college.emory.edu/culpeper/BAKEWELL/thinksheets/castas.html

Eventually, things got so complicated that only a few of the names survived.

In most Latin American societies, lighter is better. But the "one drop" rule does not apply.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. because the "black gene" is more prominent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lion Tamer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. There's a great line out of some Public Enemy song I forget.
Either Chuck D or Flavor Flav talks about white father/black mother = black child; white mother/black father = black child. I always viewed it as a brilliant slap at bigots--like "our race is genetically dominant over yours."

And I'm white, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I am white woman married to a black man and I consider
our children as multi racial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lion Tamer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. I am fortunate to live in an area where biracial couples are no big deal.
And, believe it or not, it's in Indianapolis, Indiana! But just one little area of Indy. Bigotry abounds elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
29. I also remember the terms "quadroon" and "octaroon".
Originally (IIRC) 'mulatto' was the offspring of an 'African' and a (white) European.
Thus half black (or negro) and half white.
Again IIRC, a "quadroon" was 1/4 black, an "octaroon" 1/8 black.
Of course all this was back when such stuff "mattered".
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. Because that is the way
the white male dominated society identifies him.

Had he grown up in a culture and society that was truly color blind (and not gender biased I might add) he would simply be another American running for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. Because if someone saw him walking down the street,
they'd assume he was a black man. They wouldn't assume one of his parents was white.

In other words, wherever he goes, he's treated as a black man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Here's a test that makes sense to me
If he could whistle at a a white woman in public in 1930s Mississippi?

I'm willing to bet that would not have been welcome then and he would have met a brutal end.

When racists are being racists they aren't waiting for a family tree or a DNA test. If you can be a victim of this indiscrimnate test then you certainly identify with the group that is oppressed.
Back then (I imagine in many places now still) you better have an awareness of this because your life was on the line.

But of course we have words like bi-racial, multi-racial, mixed to be more accurate and reflective of the whole person today. I am part English and French but mostly Irish-American. I don't need to pick one part of my heritage so I can understand why people would think that no one should. Yet, we don't live in this perfect world yet so I it's possible the identifying of one or the othercould be a convenience or necessity of choosing one in his or anyone's case.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Good points, marnieworld. He can and does identify
with black Americans, because he is treated as one of them every day -- despite having a white mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Because.......
read this OP that I, one with similar heritage as Obama, wrote up just a few weeks ago:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x184940
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. Simple..Racism and Power
It's racism designed to propagate a class system, to cement the power of certain people.

To have an upper class, you need a under class. And racism provides an easy method to create an underclass.

Our society could have done the opposite..said that a drop of "white " blood made someone White.

But that would have meant that one had a way into the Upper class. and an upper clas can't be sharing power. From it's POV, to share is to lose.

I have observed that Humans are brilliant and very practical when it comes to the evil they do.

Of course, the "other side" isn't much better. Now we have goobers sayign that Obama isn't really Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. It has nothing to do with Obama! That's the way our government
and governments around the world classify who's black and who's not.

Unless you want to use Mayor Ray Naggin's definition as "Chocolate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
41. The stupid "one drop rule"
I always refer to Obama as mixed-race, never black, calling mixed-race people "black" perpetuates the "one drop" rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
42. Ah, another "Barack isn't really black" argument
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 09:37 AM by IAmJacksSmirkingReve
These are getting tiresome. Let's reverse your proposition - do you have to have racial purity in order to be called white? The tenor of your post seems to suggest that it is somehow better to be considered white than black, and he should aspire to be called as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC