Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wetcanvas Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 10:47 AM
Original message
What the...?
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 10:49 AM by wetcanvas
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070306/D8NMNRFO0.html

They don't even know what Fitz wanted?

"In their questions, which were released Tuesday morning, jurors seemed confused about what Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was alleging."

My lawyer cronies said they thought Libby would walk, I'm sure they never expected the jury not to know the case at hand. After the entire trail and 9 days of deliberation!?

Forget Libby, he's walking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why jump to conclusions?
Were prosecutors saying Libby knew that Plame worked for the CIA by the time of his FBI interview, jurors asked, or does the government believe Libby's account of the Cooper conversation was untrue?

There was no way to tell from the court discussion or the notes how far along the jury has come in weighing its verdicts on the five felony counts against the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Walton said he would address the questions Tuesday.

This jury has asked four questions about the Cooper conversation. The questions offered a glimpse into the jury's deliberations but it's unclear whether they originated with only one juror or the group.


I don't see any reason to jump to "Forget Libby, he's walking."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The old adage seems appropriate.
You're basing your future on 12 people, too dumb to get out of jury duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. That impression
is the first sentence AP spin echoing defense hopes. Naturally with such a big trial and big sentence the tangled web crime has this characteristic versus a murder trial, I would think. Ordinary citizens are not
expert lawyers and the second web beyond Libby is the case argumentation itself. It is defintely no hanging jury or it would have been over with soon. A hung jury depends on one or more people digging into their doubts with a special obstinacy that gets fueled by facts and counter arguments than convicned to change its mind. It is likely doubtful any such juror squeaked through either.

I would still bet the odds on a conviction, but anyone is entitled to guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC