Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2003 CIA Deal Alleged With Iraqi Oil Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:13 AM
Original message
2003 CIA Deal Alleged With Iraqi Oil Workers
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3034.html

2003 CIA Deal Alleged With Iraqi Oil Workers

By: Ryan Grim
March 7, 2007 07:00 PM EST

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) has told The Politico that before the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, the CIA paid Iraqi oil workers not to burn the oil wells. The agency, he said, also offered them future employment in exchange for their cooperation.

CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield declined to comment on Wilson's assertion.

Wilson said that the briefing was classified at the time but that he doesn't consider it to be so anymore because the invasion is over. He made his comments during an interview about pending oil legislation in Iraq to demonstrate that he has followed developments regarding that country's oil infrastructure for many years.

Before the invasion, there were widespread fears that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein would set fire to the nation's oil wells, as he did during the Persian Gulf War in 1991. Largely, those fears did not materialize. Preventing the wells from burning had been a top priority of the Bush administration.

Wilson said that "extraordinary efforts had been made to make sure that the oil wells were not blown up. The CIA, of all things, had provided funds to the persons who worked in the oil industry that if they stopped Saddam Hussein from blowing up the wells they would be employed. Plus, they would also be given money in advance and at the conclusion -- like $100 in advance and $100 afterwards to make sure the oil wells weren't blown up -- and that's a reason they weren't."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly,
no deals were made with Iraqis to not loot hospitals, government buildings, police station, fire stations, museums, schools and other vital facilities.

But the oil is safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. had to keep the supply open for Cheney and the Big Oil Bandits
Yeah -- we keep ExxonMobil's behind covered.

Wonder how much of that payoff could have been used for BODY ARMOR for our troops? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just remember the PALLETS OF CASH BushCo sent over there
It answers many, many questions. In fact, in the beginning, before the whole occupation went into the shitter, they openly "bragged" about how part of their plan was to simply pay off nearly everybody. This story doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Remember the other key phrase which describes the Bush way of doing things: "I'm going to run America like a business." Payola and bribery is the way business gets done to these greedy fuckers. It's only business. And the first rule of business is to risk someone else's cash, never your own.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Taxpayer dollars or oil corporation dollars or missing DOD dollars?
Anyway you cut it - it's citizen dollars - taken from us.

Are we sure the deal didn't say - hands off oil, hands on everything else - OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And ho hum, no one seems to care. Business as usual (?). nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC