O‘BEIRNE: I think a great injustice—I think the justice system was abused over a big political fight.
MATTHEWS: OK. You believe that if he accepts a pardon, he is accepting guilt? Because that is the legal precedent that Jerry Ford honored when he pardoned Richard Nixon? Do you believe that he should accept guilt, which you don‘t accept? You say he is innocent.
O‘BEIRNE: He doesn‘t have to accept guilt by accepting a pardon. He doesn‘t have to do that.
MATTHEWS: Well, that is the law.
O‘BEIRNE: That was the deal with Nixon. He doesn‘t have to do that.
MATTHEWS: That was the deal. Gerald Ford, to the day he died, God rest his soul, carried in his pocket the verdict decision, which said to accept a pardon is to accept guilt. He always carried it with him. And I can read it to you now if you want, the verdict decision.
<snip>
O‘BEIRNE: He shouldn‘t have been on trial.
MATTHEWS: I go back to the law. “It‘s an act of grace which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed.” You‘re saying a pardon is something else. You‘re calling a pardon expungement. A pardon is not expungement. It doesn‘t deny the crime or the finding of a jury. It simply says he is relieved of the punishment. That‘s what a pardon is. You‘ve got this sort of sacramental notion of a pardon.
O‘BEIRNE: I‘ll look it up. I‘ll bring that—I‘ll copy that and read it.
MATTHEWS: Well, I‘ll read it to you again. Do you really think pardon means, like, he didn‘t do anything wrong, he should have never been tried, he should have never been convicted, he‘s a great guy, this was all terrible? That‘s what you consider a pardon. And you say a pardon is, Well, give it to him because he doesn‘t really—he shouldn‘t go to prison because that‘d be awful.
<more>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17517888/Clinton comes up in the exchange as well as Cap Weinberger etc.
Cato Burn is hideous...