Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Admin Will Not Oppose U.S. Attorney Law Change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:32 PM
Original message
Breaking: Admin Will Not Oppose U.S. Attorney Law Change
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 06:34 PM by babylonsister
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002715.php

Breaking: Admin Will Not Oppose U.S. Attorney Law Change
By Paul Kiel - March 8, 2007, 5:54 PM

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on the meeting senators from the Judiciary Committee had with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales this afternoon:

“While we didn’t get any better explanation for these unprecedented firings, two important developments came from this meeting. First, the Attorney General told us the Administration would not oppose our legislation requiring Senate confirmation for all U.S. Attorneys. Second, in one form or another, each of the five Department of Justice witnesses will be made available to us for questioning. The details and venue are still being worked out, but we are hopeful they will cooperate."

Edit to add:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/08/administration-caves-on-us-attorney-law/

Administration caves on U.S. Attorney law.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and other senators met with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales this afternoon. According to Schumer, Gonzales said the White House will not oppose reversing the PATRIOT Act provision that allows U.S. Attorneys to be installed without Senate approval:

“While we didn’t get any better explanation for these unprecedented firings, two important developments came from this meeting. First, the Attorney General told us the Administration would not oppose our legislation requiring Senate confirmation for all U.S. Attorneys. Second, in one form or another, each of the five Department of Justice witnesses will be made available to us for questioning. The details and venue are still being worked out, but we are hopeful they will cooperate.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
get his nutz in a vise.:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who are the five witnesses - the remaining Attornies?
Was this a closed meeting with Gonzales?

Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The REPUBLICANS in the SENATE will FILIBUSTER ANY changes to the Patriot Act
You watch!

Yeah, Bush won't fight it - but The SENATE republicans will. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not all; you might be surprised to learn some are actually angry
at Gonzo over this.

GOP Senator Ensign PISSED at DOJ/Gonzales

GOP Sen: "I Can't Even Tell You How Upset I Am"
By Paul Kiel - March 8, 2007, 11:29 AM

I've stopped counting how many toes the Justice Department stepped on when they purged eight prosecutors last December.

But one set of toes belongs to Sen. John Ensign (R-NV). Not only did the Justice Department go over Ensign's head to fire Nevada's U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden, but they apparently "misled" him as to why they were doing it.

From The Las Vegas Review-Journal:

Ensign was particularly irate over the firing of Bogden, an independent who Ensign picked in 2001 to oversee federal crime prosecutions in Nevada. Bogden, a prosecutor in the Northern Nevada office of the U.S. attorney, was nominated by President Bush and confirmed by the Senate in October 2001.

In December, the Justice Department fired Bogden over Ensign's objections. Ensign said last month he was told the dismissal was for "performance reasons."

Justice officials initially told Congress that was the reason. But Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General William Moschella told a House subcommittee "no particular deficiencies" in Bogden's performance existed....

Ensign said Wednesday he was decidedly unhappy.

"What the Justice Department testified yesterday is inconsistent with what they told me," Ensign said. "I can't even tell you how upset I am at the Justice Department."

Asked whether he believed he was misled, Ensign said, "I was not told the same thing that I was at the hearing, let me put it that way."

Ensign said he pressed the topic at a meeting with White House officials Wednesday morning. He added he would be "making further inquiries."

"I am not pleased with the Justice Department at this point," he said. "I told the White House this morning if I could renominate (Bogden) I would."

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002707.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hope so -- but I'd put NOTHING past the Senate Republicans
OR Joe Lieberman. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I understand totally, but Ensign gave me some hope. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. damn
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 06:53 PM by melissinha
Thats right, the majority of the fired were Republicans... dare I say, the "decent sort".....

Its very encouraging... on both counts.... Ensign and no veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. All the Democrats need to do is give them an example of what could happen
when a Democrat is elected as President.

President nominates a right wing that the Republicans would accept
Senate approves of nomination
President tells appointed U.S. Attorney to step down after 6 to 12 months
President appoints replacement more to their liking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm shocked the rethugs are hanging in with this admin to begin with,
especially those up for reelection in 08. Seems suicidal to me. I know it's not because of their moral compasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. a sudden reversal on NSA and now this. looks like they push till someone
stops them.

lets Defund the war-------see what they do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yep.
just keep poking the bastards with sticks.

more and more sticks.

they're gonna start to really freak . . . this is getting interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Nope lets defund the White House instead...
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 09:27 PM by ddeclue
Allocate $400k for the President and $200k for the Veep and we've covered the Constitutional requirement... zero them out of the budget... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was It * Or Rove Or Cheney That Said - Make This Go Away.....
is that why the sudden cooperation? Why the change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Make Arlen Specter sponsor the legislation.
Eat some crow Arlen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now that the damage is done. (nt)
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 07:21 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gee thanks Alberto for....
for giving me back (partially) my democracy which wasn't yours to take in the first place.


Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC