Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Hagel be the one who knocks Rudy, Mitt & McCain off the GOP top spot?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:12 PM
Original message
Will Hagel be the one who knocks Rudy, Mitt & McCain off the GOP top spot?

Tweety has him on Monday (evidently following his announcement) and he thinks that Hagel has the perfect mix R's are looking for-

He's against Bush's Iraq plan, and he's extremely conservative.



He has the Veteran status that McCain has..

And the rightie values that Rudy doesn't have..




They want someone with crossover appeal, and according to SurveyUSA (quoted in Wikipedia):

According to a SurveyUSA poll, Hagel has a 10% higher approval rating among Nebraska Democrats than Republicans

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Hagel

What would prevent him from gaining the GOP frontrunner status?










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. While he's pissed off the neo-cons with his criticism of the Iraq war,
people forget that he is quite the social conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. He certainly looks the part. And people vote looks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. YES. I have been saying this for months.
Hagel APPEALS. He's "manly" with a good head of hair, which the GOP like, he's CONSERVATIVE, he is a REAL "straight talker," and he speaks plainly and directly.

What could stop him? Huckabee. Lack of funding. His temper. A skeleton in his closet (though he might be able to 'plain talk' his way out of that--after all, his dysfunctional upbringing is well known).

Ignore the asshole in the dress with his third wife, pay no attention to the Mormon, forget the aged POW with the reconstructed jaw--Hagel and Huckabee are the ones to look out for.

If they can get money, they are off to the races.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I don't think he's under control enough for the Borg.
And for us, that's a good thing if they sabotage him and go with someone less appealing. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's exactly right, and you sure made me laugh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes... he is too finicky for the hive mind... he may have developed a celluar level
resistance that makes it harder for him to be absorbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Good!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:31 PM
Original message
The Borg, though, is showing signs of shoving its head up its own ass.
If the GOP bolt and revolt, they aren't coming to us if they have a 'manly man' option like Chuck Hagel.

And Huckabee shows signs of Borgish lockstep. That is a key reason why I think the odds for him are about equal to Hagel, even though "Huckabee" is a bumpkinesque name for a president. Of course, who ever thought we'd elect not one, but two assholes named Bush without too too much snickering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, we never did elect Junior.
I feel very hopeful for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. That's entirely true, that. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I don't know a thing about Huckabee. I guess I better find out.
Hagel I know from his voting machine problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Both have a great deal of 'charm' in their own ways.
Huckabee comes off as a REAL folksy, sincere charmer. He was a fatty who got fit, he's like a kindly uncle, he has a nice speaking voice, an engaging manner, he wrote a popular book, he was a governor, he knows how to sell himself. He will win the ENTIRE South, if he doesn't step on his crank and say something stupid. The challenge would be to win the west....

I wouldn't write either one of them off. The Three Stooges currently at the top of the GOP lists are pushovers. Hagel and Huckabee, though, if they break out, will excite the party--they'll see them as Great White Hopes, frankly.

With the 24 hour news cycle, that old "name recognition" thing isn't as important as it used to be. Look at Obama--the nation has gone from WHO???? to that snarky Osama/Hussein bullshit (a lesson that any publicity is good publicity, as that backfired big time) to people knowing he smoked (ooh), he's on the patch (aaah!) to knowing his wife's name. He packs fundraisers, he gets lots of media play. And there's a LONG way to go until the election.

Hagel or Huckabee, with the right campaign, could do the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Now I remember him. Is he BFEE or a loose cannon?
That's (in my humble if paranoid opinion,lol) what will decide it this round. They've taken a huge hit where they thought they'd have a walk in the park. The hive is regrouping.

We have a very good shot in 08 if the Dem leadership can avoid being made responsible for Iraq. It was lost long before they got power. They really, really need a way to say that, yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Both, actually, in a way. But he hides it well. He'd hook up with the
Monkeycrowd if he hasn't already--after all, he hates Bill Clinton. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. he comes "equipped"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. They should run him but my bet is that they won't because
he's not an insider.

He would be an appealing candidate and I hope he doesn't get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he's tough enough to go after them
He's so right winger and conservative on the social issues that he'll hit Rudy G where he's most vulnerable. Then he can go after the rest one bowling pin at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. "What do you believe? This is a TOUGH business"--here he is, in action
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZCeUhLkGto

Contrast the timbre of his voice with that of the Monkey. Or Rudy. Or McCain. Or Romney.

The guy is swimming in testosterone compared to those choirboys. He's speaking forcefully, plainly, reasonably, simply.

People vote viscerally sometimes...especially not-so-swift people who actually think the GOP has a workable agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. You've got that right
I have a winger friend. We worked together for over 20 years. When she'd talk about governors of our state, she'd say how this one or that "looked" like a governor. I truly believe that some people will go ga-ga over Hagel, his personality and macho good looks. Yes, the conservative women I know even think W is handsome.

Hagel's arch conservative social positions will reel in the fundies. I think many who are turning on the war will find him a comfortable fit. All he has to do is get his position on the war phrased right and they'll flock to him. This far out, he has plenty of time to work on raising money. He's a better fit than any of the other candidates except the bland Brownback and lackluster Huckabee.

Unless the networks go against him hard, he'll have guys who can relate to him and even female fan clubs will crop up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Harder to beat for a Dem. but a good man.
--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, it's just my opinion, but...

As far as major crossover appeal --- as well as someone who can kick Hagel's ass in the debates -- I'm hoping still holding out for...



-- --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I dunno. I kind of get the feeling he might be happier in a larger scale,
hugely important, regional Ambassador-type role. Sort of like what Clinton did with ADM Howe, only much bigger, much more entrenched, something with opportunities for diplomacy that also requires a tactical military mind. The way the Monkey has screwed up the world, we'll need a few of those, I think.

But who knows? It's early yet. He has time yet to jump in if he wants to.

Is he fundraising at all? If not, I'd expect to see him in the cabinet. Or an ambassadorship. Assuming he stumps for the nominee, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmike Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. in a word-- no.
There is absolutely no way that Hagel can pull this off. He has been consistently and vocally been "off the reservation" when it comes to Iraq. The GOP does not reward that type of behaviour. Also, just who is his constituency?
Hagel is an old style conservative(in a good way). His type is just about extinct in the current GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So you think that after their butt-whooping last November...

..as well as the national polls showing support for the war and how it's been handled at on all time low (even on their side) -- that Hagel wouldn't be the knight in shining armor they're looking for.

I dunno..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No party learns that fast.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 04:32 PM by HappyWeasel
Also, Hagel has almost no support right now and the GOP would never nominate from the second or third tier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. They just don't KNOW him....YET. Once they do, expect his numbers to move way up.
He might even swipe a small slice of the conservative (Catholic) Democratic vote, too; the ones that hold their noses when voting for the pro-choice candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hagel is too intellectual for the mainstream Repukies...
he's not "folksy" enough, you wouldn't want to "sit down and have a beer with him". And he's far to conservative for the mainstream Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, but you are not trying to get the other parties votes.
I mean, with the war, the hive mind is the most pickiest, even more than on abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. He would be a tough candidate to beat
In fact, he's probably the best candidate the GOP has to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. he can...
but he won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. I think he'll jump to the top based on newbie status and name recognition
He'll hten fall back to mere mortal status and slug it out with the rest of them in the trenches.

The hard core GOP base will wind up resenting his antiwar stance, making a primary win difficult.

Were he to get thru the primaries, I suspect the Dems would find him waaaaaaaay too conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. well... only 10% of either party will betray their party.
but most of the indies,will find him too reactionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes - several of us here at DU have been saying so for over a year now.
Every move Hagel has made the last two years has completely stolen the maverick label from McCain and he will attract the Independents.

He comes off the best on TV out of ALL the GOP hopefuls and most of the Dem ones, too, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yanno ......
.... you're right on the teevee thing. Sad to say, but he does.

Beauty is always in the eye of the beholder, so there'll be lots of people who imagine this not to be the case, but I agree with you. He's at the top of the 'Presidential Hopefuls' telegenic scale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Well, I for one do think he's hot., He's a gorgeous, manly man..
And he comes across as genuine, unlike McVane who is a panderer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'd rather run against their best than their worst. The truth is we could
end up with a repuke in '08. There's always that chance. If a repuke wins, please let it be someone that's not as sneaky and dishonest as the last four repukes. PLEASE!!! I don't think we could take another one of that variety like Rudy or McVane. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Hagel will not run in 2008.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 05:56 PM by rep the dems
Just a feeling I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. Nah. I bet they go full-tilt Jesus crazy and nominate Brownback. nt
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 05:58 PM by impeachdubya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
39. The way he has slapped
Chimpy around the last couple of years on the war will not endure him to the base. I can't imagine the Repubs rewarding him with the nomination. I do ,however, think he would be tough to beat in a national election. He is a made for TV candidate. If he would moderate his conservative social views just a tad he would probably be unbeatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. I think he will be hard to beat...
He will get the moderates/independents that McCain has lost. Although he won't have the support of the Republican machine (as McCain didn't in 2000) I think a lot of people would go with him because there are those who don't like to see one party control Congress and the White House. Just my thoughts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
41. Possible. But at this point, given the dramatic flaws in the GOP candidates,
I'm thinking the Iowa caucus will in in a scoreless tie.

None of these Repukes are all that ideologically attractive to their base -- there's a fly in the ointment to every one of them.

If the fundie nutbags unite behind, say, Brownback, Brownback could pull off a stunning win in Iowa. I think he gets ground down the following week in New Hampshire, though, and Hagel could be the guy to do most of the grinding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. He would be tough
cause he comes off as saner than most of the GOP line-up. Also more moderate so the wingers won't like him.

He'd sure throw a monkey-wrench into the GOP primaries. :toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. He is a fine-looking man, with a manly persona (combat vet and all)
--Tucker Carlson has a man-crush on him, called him the Gary Cooper of the GOP. But can he compete with Fred Thompson for TV appeal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
44. Hagel is less of a concern than Fred Thompson
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 06:48 PM by Leilani
There is a growing movement to draft Thompson, & supposedly he's open to the idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. So I've heard--no actors, please--we need a REAL president this time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. The point is that he's more of a threat
Republicans don't like Hagel, but they do like Thompson.

If nominated, Thompson is better known nationwide than Hagel.

Also, Thompson is better on his feet than Hagel. He's very smart & quite funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I agree with you in terms of
Thompson garnering more support--definitely more likely to get the nom, although if he's so great, why is he only being drafted now? I suspect he's got some family issues/skeletons that has kept him out of the running--is that why he left the Senate for Hollywood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
48. That's my guess. This is so Rovian.
My Rovedar is is going from a beep.....beeep...beeep to a beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC