Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Walter Reed scandle - this has been going on long before Cheney administration came to town.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Walter Reed scandle - this has been going on long before Cheney administration came to town.
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 12:27 PM by JohnWxy
Much as I would like to lay the entire blame for the shameful treatment of wounded vets at Walter Reed at the feet of the Cheney administration this sort of dispicable treatment of vets in need has been going on since the Revolutionary War. After vets come back from action needing help of any sort it seems they have to beg the Government for what ought to be forthcoming without going through a gauntlet of haughty, niggardly bureaucrats to obtain. It seems people are more easily motivated to send men and now women into harms way but later when vets come back from war in pieces (physically and psychologically), the former cheerleaders for intervention and war are nowhere to be found. And other than the vets themselves almost no one can be found to plead the veterans case for better treatment.


This is shameful treatment of men and women who were are heroes, who have done what their country asked of them and risked everything for their country. These men and women didn't set the policy but it was their job to carry it out.

The new wrinkle the Cheney administration has brought to this anti-morality play is their penchant for contracting out everything the Government does. (I guess they feel since the PResident is bought and paid for by various wealthy powerful groups, corporations and business associations, why shouldn't the rest of the Government be based on a commercial arrangement? Money paid for services performed.) The company which was responsible for building maintenance at Walter Reed just happens to also be the outfit who had truckloads of ice running all over the place EXCEPT where they were suppposed to be after the Katrina disaster. The ice was being delivered everywhere except where it was needed.

Contracting out services, the GOP likes to sell it as way to save money, so often in the long run does NOT SAVE money, and often results in significant reduction in the quality of services performed. This is because their are many people out there who are eager to GET a Government contract, but once they get the contract spend most of their efforts figuring out how to deliver less and less for the same amount of money. In order to preclude this from happening you would have to add massive amounts of auditors to monitor performance (full-time). Then, where is the savings?

And even with close monitoring I still feel the quality issue trumps all others (and remember, in the long run their usually is NOT any savings)

YEs, the way we have treated vets after they come home from war has been a national disgrace for a long time. I can only hope this latest example will actually lead to a real commitment to change the situation. But, I'm going to wait and see what happens.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its been going down hill for a generation and multiple administrations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Let's not forget that a generation ago Dick Cheney was SecDef
It doesn't get mentioned much though. I was really suprised that Kerry didn't come out hard at Cheney when they started the 'Kerry voted to cancel these weapons and planes from the military', because those were items that CHENEY recommended to Congress for cancellation. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Failure of leadership to deal with the higher than
anticipated number of wounded soldiers. First stop might have been Landstuhl, but they didn't do enough to plan for the higher numbers of soldiers coming through the system. Seems to me that they ignored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. once you're given your release papers you're on you own.


Definitely. they didn't even bother to consider: let's see, x-thousand wounded coming off battle-field means y-number of beds for y-number of months of rehab. My question is: what the hell WERE they thinking?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC