Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich: "I’m prepared to discuss the war, health care, trade, or any other issue anytime, anywhere

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:21 PM
Original message
Kucinich: "I’m prepared to discuss the war, health care, trade, or any other issue anytime, anywhere
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 05:27 PM by Flabbergasted
with any audience, answering any question from any media. And any candidate who won’t shouldn’t be President of the United States."


http://kucinich.us/node/3532


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proud to support Kucinch
Unfortunately he's too real to be a factor in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's up to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. You may want have a look at this thread already posted on this topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I've edited to include the line that I was trying to highlight.
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 05:30 PM by Flabbergasted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tucker seized on that.
Kucinich has lost my respect.

That is not what it was about, it was not what happened.

Kucinich will get a lot of coverage from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What happened to the NH debate?
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 05:30 PM by Flabbergasted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Huh?
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 05:33 PM by madfloridian
Tucker Carlson, Pat Buchanan, and Bill Press all had a field today with the "liberal" Democrats taking over the party and refusing to go on Fox.

They really were spinning. Kucinich should have been there with them. They said no candidate should boycott Fox...and not a one is that I know of.

Kucinich is either unaware that it was blogs and activists who did this against the party's wishes, or he is manipulating facts.

He got great attention from Tucker.

I don't know about NH...I am talking about NV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Was NH sponsored by Fox? Just asking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kucinich has his facts dead wrong about NV.
I don't know about NH, but I think there were other factors there.

He needs to do his research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What other factors do you suspect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It was not the candidates who stopped the NV debate.
They had very little to say until the activists and bloggers were making it uncomfortable for the NV Dems who had not been consulted anyway. Then Edwards said he would not appear there, there would be many others.

It was not the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. What other factors were involved in NH? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I suspect the other candidates
are manipulating the schedule of debates. I agree 100% with Dennis on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kucinich is my choice, I wonder if he realized what was taking place
and that the other candidates were opposing FAUX NOISE instead of ducking from him. Another platform could have been established to allow debates anyway.

Dennis is a good guy, fighting a good fight. I can cut him some slack on this, if this is his biggest sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Why are they ducking out of NH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Who is ducking out of NH?
There is a debate there in April with CNN and local papers. Edwards is going, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. ....
http://www.citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070309/NEWS0201/70309011/-1/CITIZEN

So far, few of the high-buzz candidates have committed to the WMUR-TV-New Hampshire Union Leader-CNN debates set to air nationally. Some top candidates are staying away from the April 4 and 5 debates, recognizing a potential gaffe could plague them for the 10 months before New Hampshire voters cast their ballots. Others say simply appearing beside thus-far-non-factor candidates only elevates them.

''If you goof, it's going to be a lot more of a goof than normal. Any gaffe will be augmented by the fact it's just one or two of 'the names' with several of the lower-tier candidates,'' said Mark Wrighton, a University of New Hampshire political science professor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. The NH has been pushed back to June and there is a debate on 4/26 in So Car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Probably because it is a small state. I noticed
most have already committed to California...so go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Just asking. Link? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. so, what are YOU afraid of ... ?
(not directed at the OP)

“No one is further removed from Fox’s political philosophy than I am, but fear should not dictate decisions that affect hundreds of millions of Americans and billions of others around the world who are starving for real leadership.”

words spoken like a true Roosevelt,
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. The national debt, at 3am, in the shark tank at Seaworld?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. I agree with him (posted for the third time)
(Pardon me for posting this initial response three times, but this is the third thread on Kucinich's statement. I explained further in the other threads.)

I understand the rationale that it's about "delegitimizing Fox," but weighing that against the importance of the race itself, I think the campaign against Fox is secondary.

And, while Fox is undeniably a rightwing propaganda outlet as a whole, moment-by-moment and person-by-person there are isolated cases where it actually can compare equally or even favorably to other networks. Ted Koppel was absolutely *terrible* "moderating" the debate in 2003, for example; no Fox head could have done worse. And, while I'm an unabashed Clark supporter, he's experienced nothing on Fox as bad as Scarborough accusing him of "aiding and abetting our enemies" and implying he didn't support the troops, and then not letting him speak.

Further, I think there are enough people watching Fox who NEED to hear the Democrats speak -- as opposed to hearing the Republicans mischaracterize what the Democrats are saying -- that it's worthwhile. And, in the long run, I think hearing the Democrats speak is the way to change minds and ultimately change channels.

Again, I understand that Fox is a rightwing network, but I think avoiding it isn't the only way to deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. i'll kick
:kick: for your message(s).

where are your other 2 responses?

i'll :kick: & Rec! those too,
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sounds like a candidate with no strings attached
How could I not support him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Don't debate criminals
It is pointless trying to "debate" non-issues in a propaganda forum, i.e; Fox News. I'm sure the majority of the questions would have consisted of either "When did you stop beating your wife?" to "Are you going to raise taxes because you are a communist or because you are godless?" and the final question : "Are you weak on defense or simply against our soldiers in Iraq?"

Kucinich needs to get a friggin clue. He's running for president of the U.S.A. not Don Quixote to take down a friggin windmill. Geesshh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Why are candidates refusing the NH debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's Jumped the Shark!
Kucinich has all the right ideas but abso-F**king-lutely NO, I say again, NO COMMON SENSE as to how to come across to the media.

Yes, he's now the American Political "Don Quixote."

R.I.P. while enjoying 15 minutes within the propagandist, authoritarian forum known as FOX News.

Good-bye Kucinich. Enjoy your congressional seat and your new wife for that's all you deserve. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. Poor Kooch. Now he's got the Loofa on his side
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 06:11 PM by rinsd
Tonight, Bill O’Reilly attacked the “radical movement” that opposed the Nevada Democratic Party’s debate with Fox News. O’Reilly said that MoveOn, “the Daily Kos or whatever that stupid thing is,” and others “use propaganda techniques perfected by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi minister of information. They lie, distort, defame, all the time.” Progressive activists attack Fox News because “we report on them accurately,” O’Reilly said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good for Dennis.
Remember last election? He got batted around very disrespectfully by Tweety and said he was never going back on that show again. Well here at DU you would have thought the world was blowing up, how dare he? What a total stupid move? Well, none of the other Democrats supported him then and none of them are supporting him at all with anything so I say go for it Dennis. Separate yourself, speak where anyone will listen. There is an enormous difference in his message and all the others so he needs to make that known. Geeze, this is such a big deal? It is about time.

I am leaving so I will not be able to respond so flame away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC