Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Treasury casts a wide net under Patriot Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:43 PM
Original message
Treasury casts a wide net under Patriot Act
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16889790.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Treasury casts a wide net under Patriot Act

By Kevin G. Hall
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Under a little-noticed provision in the USA Patriot Act, the Treasury Department has ordered severe restrictions against foreign banks or countries for reasons beyond the stated purpose of the law and without producing evidence.

Section 311 of the 2001 Patriot Act was drafted to halt terrorist financing and money laundering, but the Bush administration has used it against an alleged source of terrorist financing - a bank in Syria - only once. The Treasury has invoked it more often to punish alleged human-rights abuses or offshore banking havens.

Although Congress has yet to examine the Treasury's use of Section 311, the provision is likely to add to the controversy over other sweeping powers the executive branch of government acquired under the Patriot Act. According to a recent audit, the FBI used the act illegally to obtain personal information about U.S. citizens, and the administration has agreed to abandon a provision that it used to replace eight U.S. attorneys for what Democrats charge were partisan political reasons.

"It becomes a form of expanding executive power that's difficult to check," said Shayana Kadidal, staff attorney for the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, a rights organization that's critical of many Patriot Act provisions.

Supporters view Section 311 as a diplomatic sledgehammer that gets results. Critics - many of whom refused to speak on the record, saying they feared retribution - complain that the provision denies suspects due process and presumes that the accused are guilty rather than innocent.

Through Section 311, the Treasury doesn't have to tell accused banks or countries what threat they allegedly pose to the U.S. financial system, and the Treasury has the power to act as both prosecutor and judge.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does Section 311 have any impact with Swiss banks? I thought
they were legendary with their secrecy and discretion concerning their customers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good question I don't have an answer to. I don't know if
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 02:25 PM by babylonsister
the Swiss would honor anything the US asked of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. but I thought we could
just trust them, they seem like nice boys, they used to cut the grass.:sarcasm:

30-Year IRS Agent Arrested for Tax Fraud

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/03/30year_irs_agen.html

Harry Willner, an IRS agent for over 30 years, was arrested yesterday on tax fraud charges. Prosecutors allege that he and others dodged taxes by claiming that their income was offset by deductions belonging to a company he operated out of his home. From the Associated Press:

ederal prosecutors said Willner, 59, engaged in the scheme while working as a revenue agent with the large and mid-size business unit of the IRS in New York. They said he carried out the fraud by trying to create tax loopholes while purportedly working as an officer at an advertising business, NIA Advertising Inc., whose address was the same as his residence's. The government said Willner claimed that NIA loaned a company, Royal Magazine Inc., $849,000 from 1998 through 2001 but provided no evidence of a written contract or agreement to verify the debt. Willner then claimed a "bad debt" reduction on NIA's corporate tax return of more than $758,000, though he could not take advantage of much of it because the income of the business was minimal, the indictment said. Afterward, Willner tried to get an accountant to help him get other taxpayers to funnel their income through his advertising business so they could take advantage of the large debt, according to the indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC