Tamara Draut
Today, a new generation of young people is finding the path to the middle class blocked by the decline of high-paying manufacturing jobs, the decline of strong unions and the rising cost of a college education.
In a Point of View column at www.aflcio.org, Tamara Draut, author of Strapped: Why America’s 20- and 30-Somethings Can’t Get Ahead (available from The Union Shop Online™), says the loss of manufacturing jobs and the switch to lower-paying service jobs has made it harder for young workers to get ahead. Draut writes:
…young adults of all educational levels are earning less today than they would have 20 or even 30 years ago. Back in 1974, the typical 25- to 34-year-old male high school graduate earned $42,697, in inflation-adjusted 2004 dollars. Three decades later, median earnings for young adult male high school graduates was $30,400. That’s a 29 percent loss in income compared to young workers a generation ago.
Low wages also contribute to the high rate of uninsured 18-to-34 year olds, Draut says. Eighteen million in that age bracket don’t have health insurance. The majority of young adult workers who are uninsured earn less than $10 an hour.
Draut, who grew up in a union household and was the first in her family to go to college, says the declining economic mobility and security confronting young workers today is due in part to the inability of workers to freely choose a union. For generations, American parents have joined unions and worked hard so their children would have a better life. Because of the union movement, workers with a high school education or less have been able to earn enough to buy homes and pay for college educations for their sons and daughters.
A generation ago, young workers entered the labor market on an escalator: As productivity went up, so did wages, producing a steady and swift progression in earnings. Today, young people are entering the labor market on one of those automated airport walkways: Wages remain flat despite productivity gains and longer hours on the job.
In 2005, only 10.7 percent of workers aged 25 to 34 were union members, compared with 16.5 percent of workers aged 45 to 54 and 55 to 64.
Draut, who directs the economic opportunity program for Demos, a nonpartisan public policy research and advocacy organization, says one of the best ways to revive economic opportunity, mobility and security for young workers is to pass the Employee Free Choice Act.
Young people, the majority of whom don’t have a bachelor’s degree, have been hit hardest by the decline in manufacturing jobs and the vacuum left by the weakening and hobbling of organized labor over the past three decades, she says. Young people need the union movement, and the future of the movement depends on organizing more young workers, she adds.
She also suggests that young workers need:
* Increased funding of higher education at the state level so all young people who want to go to college have access to that dream. At the federal level, we need more generous grant aid for college.
* Creation of more “earn-and-learn programs,” particularly investments in career ladders for the health and teaching professions.
Order the book here:
http://unionshop.aflcio.org/shop/product1.cfm?SID=1&Product_ID=613http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/03/14/young-workers-need-unions-to-build-a-better-life/From the article: Young Workers Need Unions to Build a Better Life
by James Parks, Mar 14, 2007