SNIP>>>>>>.
Interviewer
You also speak about America remaining true to its values, and what many Europeans would ask is `how does Guantanamo, or how do the secret prisons the CIA ran, and the practice of extraordinary rendition fit in with America's values?'Hillary
"Well, I don't think that they are a good fit. I think that there's always a balance between security and liberty, and, certainly, under our constitution the pendulum has swung back and forth.
We had one of our greatest presidents, Abraham Lincoln, who suspended the writ of habeas corpus which is one of the great legacies of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence. Well, we've got to get back to striking that balance in a more thoughtful way than we have been doing under the Bush administration.
And it's not easy. I'm not going to sit here and say it's self-evident exactly how to strike it. But certainly, the imbalances, the rather extreme reactions that we've seen out of the Bush administration to some of the real threats we face and the desire to protect us against those threats, I think can be recalibrated more in line with our values.">>>>>snip
Interviewer
But would you close Guantanamo?Hillary:
"I'm not going to
speculate on that now. I think that's the kind of tactical decision that has to be considered depending on what the real facts are at the time. Obviously, I feel that the administration has misfired in the way that it has refused to expedite the treatment of the individuals down in Guantanamo. And, frankly, it has relied on unreliable, hearsay evidence and we need to clean up the processes.
Then we can get to the point of what will we do with the people once we have totally considered them on the basis of legitimate concrete steps to determine whether they should be held or released. Then we can deal with the actual facility
issue. That's not the real problem. The real problem is the processes we've used."
SNIP>>>>>>> http://www.ireland.com/focus/2007/clinton/index.html