Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Probes Report That Soldiers ‘Medically Unfit For Battle’ Being Sent To Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:28 AM
Original message
Congress Probes Report That Soldiers ‘Medically Unfit For Battle’ Being Sent To Iraq
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 10:29 AM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/15/congress-injured-veterans/

Congress Probes Report That Soldiers ‘Medically Unfit For Battle’ Being Sent To Iraq

Salon.com’s Mark Benjamin, who first revealed the squalor at Walter Reed hospital two years ago, this week reported that injured U.S. soldiers are being dispatched back to Iraq:

As the military scrambles to pour more soldiers into Iraq, a unit of the Army’s 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Benning, Ga., is deploying troops with serious injuries and other medical problems, including GIs who doctors have said are medically unfit for battle. Some are too injured to wear their body armor, according to medical records.

Yesterday, House Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO) and and Military Personnel Subcommittee Chairman Vic Snyder (D-AR) requested an immediate review of these allegations in a letter to the Government Accountability Office.

Also yesterday, Benjamin appeared on Hardball, one of the few mainstream media organizations to cover the scoop. Benjamin noted that the Army does not dispute the central claim of his report. “When I interviewed the brigade commander here, he is not disputing that he is sending people back to Iraq with some of these problems. What he’s saying is that I’ll put them behind a desk and they’ll be safe,” Benjamin said. “The soldiers frankly just don’t buy it. I mean, they’ve been to Iraq before and there’s just not that many safe places.” Watch it at link:

Benjamin appeared with Army Sgr. Ronald Jenkins, who was ordered to Iraq despite having spinal fusion surgery that made it extremely difficult for him to wear body armor. Jenkins admitted he was “concerned about reprisal” for speaking out, but said, “this is about taking care of soldiers. And, you know, this is what I’ve done my whole career…and a lot of soldiers, like I said, they can’t speak out.” Jenkins said that since the story was published, he was informed he was no longer being sent to Iraq.

Transcript:

BARNICLE: Mark, briefly, what’s the story?

BENJAMIN: Well, there are two questions that my reporting, I think, uncovered down in Fort Benning. One is, should we be sending injured troops to Iraq, some who are so hurt that they can’t wear their body armor? The second is, if we’re going to make that decision to send people to Iraq — you know, people who can’t wear their body armor — what kind of review — can they, can we just have them walk into a room and take a quick look at them and have a conversation with them and decide that in fact they are fit for duty, or should they have some sort of, you know, serious medical review, exams, x-rays, that kind of thing?

BARNICLE: Sergeant Jenkins, did you have a medical review? You’re not going to Iraq, right?

JENKINS: No, I’ve been informed I’m not going now. I was there in a meeting we had with some of the soldiers from my brigade on 15 February. I was brought in. I sat down with my brigade surgeon and my division surgeon. They welcomed me into the room and he looked at a few things on the screen as far as my military medical records. As far as what they had on the screen — they actually didn’t have my medical records, my medical records were at the military correspondence being copied. He made a statement to the fact that the Army — more than likely, I should have been Rear D, which, Read D is someone who stays in the rear while they deploy. Then he also stated the fact that I could be deployed to a place where I don’t have to wear any gear, and also in the same conversation, he told me that if a mortar round hit, that I wouldn’t have time to grab the kevlar anyway, which, I didn’t really find the humor in that.

BARNICLE: So, sergeant, you are career Army, correct?

JENKINS: Correct. 21 years.

BARNICLE: Twenty-one years in the service. And what’s your medical issue?

JENKINS: My medical issue is I had a spinal surgery where I had a spinal fusion. I had four of my — my c-3 through c-6 vertebrae were removed in the back and I have titanium rods and screws in my neck now, my neck and upper back.

+++

BARNICLE: Sergeant, were you afraid to speak on the record? You spoke on the record to Mark. Were you afraid of any lash back at you?

JENKINS: Well, I’m concerned about reprisal. But, you know, this is something that — this is about taking care of soldiers. And, you know, this is what I’ve done my whole career. And for me to go in there and have this happen to me, and my profile was adjusted and changed and that was not the correct thing to do. So, yeah, I had a big problem with that, and a lot of soldiers, like I said, they can’t speak out. And I’m not saying I’m the advocate for this. Like I said, I was just a guy that was approached. I had a situation that occurred and I spoke out about it. And yeah, yeah, I do have concerns though.

+++

BENJAMIN: And I just wanted to add, the Army is not disputing — when I interviewed the brigade commander here, he is not disputing that he is sending people back to Iraq with some of these problems. What he’s saying is that I’ll put them behind a desk and they’ll be safe. The soldiers frankly just don’t buy it. I mean, they’ve been to Iraq before and there’s just not that many safe places. The only thing that’s under debate is, when the command brought 75 soldiers to the troop medical clinic on February 15, lined them up in a line and brought them into a room — these are people that doctors had previously, in some cases, said, you can’t go to Iraq — and changed that decision, was that okay? That’s the only dispute that remains in this particular story that I’m aware of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. This Practice is not new they have been sending troops with mental problems back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, it needs to stop! Congress does need to look into it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep that report was two years ago
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 10:47 AM by Monkeyman
It was a report of five Articles done by Hartford Courant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They're actually talking about a recent article by Salon, though
I don't doubt the info has been out there and no one paid attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. We tried to get it out at that time it was called to political by leadership of the House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. ?? is - is there ANYTHING Dem's DON'T have to look into???
the level of incompetence under Bushco is UNBELIEVABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Potentially just as big
This is potentially just as big as the Walter Reed scandals. It should not be allowed to fall down the sink hole of administration spin and cover-up. It goes to show the soundness of Murtha's basic point about preventing tired, sick, untrained, and ill-equipped troops from being sent to Iraq. The best solution: bring them ALL home NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I also think this is 'big' and would expect more heads to roll over it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Its is but will the Media Blast it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. k/r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC