Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pardon me, no please pardon me?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:58 PM
Original message
Pardon me, no please pardon me?
What would happen if GWB resigns, then Cheney is prez and he pardons GWB, then he appoints condi as VP and immediately resigns. Now condi is prez and she pardons cheney and appoints the next most likely bushbot as VP, resigns and bushbot pardons condi.

The whole lot of them can then retire and live happily ever after.

Political Pardons SUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those were Scooter Libby's words right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Presidential pardons are a curious quirk, and we've had them forever.
They'll never go away. They are a perogative that makes that lousy job worth having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even worst case scenario, wouldn't happen that way.
Bush could resign, ok. Cheney could pardon him, also ok. But Cheney can't simply appoint Rice as new VP -- both houses of Congress must approve her under the 25th Amendment, and you can be sure that no such appointment would get to the floor of either house in any short time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Two words, signing statement! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Three words: Sargent at Arms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Two other words: Recess appointment
Yeah, I know, but with this bunch of crooks, I wouldn't put anything past them. If it were me, I'd frisk every last one of them on their way out, and have someone count the silverware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Amendment 25 doesn't permit recess appointments for VP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Knowing ths bunch, though?
There's no direct prohibition on a recess appointment, and Bush has shown no real compunction for doing anything he doesn't want to do. The pertinent clause of the 25th Amendment is:

"2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress."

The use of "shall" implies that it's an obligation for the President to nominate a Vice President who will take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress. But in the case of a recess appointment (and never forget that here in Oceania we are in a state of perpetual war, and therefore in a constant state of emergency), Bush would appoint his best crony as soon as Congress adjourned for a weekend because the country can't wait on Congress to makes its dawdling way to confirming a nominee, and it's just the kind of opening the terrorists would be looking for, and besides, it's just a recess appointment that will only last until the end of next year, and what's the big deal, the President needs to be able to appoint his own people to fill sensitive positions around him, and why is Congress trying to meddle in the affairs of the Executive?

The Faux arguments practically write themselves by this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pardons are a necessary evil
They are an important check on the judicial system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC