Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS: Will Gonzales Fall For Attorney Firings? (Sources: AG's Ouster Is Inevitable)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:08 PM
Original message
CBS: Will Gonzales Fall For Attorney Firings? (Sources: AG's Ouster Is Inevitable)
One of the eight recently fired U.S. attorneys at the center of a growing political scandal tells CBS News that he lost his job because he "did not play ball" with powerful Republicans.

"I believe, and I think all my colleagues believe, the real reason is partisan politics," the former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico, David Iglesias told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric. "I believe I was fired because I did not play ball with two members of the Republican delegation here in New Mexico. I did not give them privileged information that could have been used in the October and November time frame."

The fallout from the firings continues to grow in Washington, and sources tell CBS News that it looks like Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will take the fall.

Republicans close to the White House tell CBS News chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod that President Bush is in "his usual posture: pugnacious, that no one is going to tell him who to fire." But sources also said Gonzales' firing is just a matter of time.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/16/politics/main2580260.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. "his usual posture: pugnacious"
That's our little boy bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I dunno, I think considering all that went on today, his position
is fetal. With a half-empty fifth of Jack Daniels in his grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And two empties on the side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Pugnacious = asshole with a chip on his shoulder. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. And this is why they really didn't want
the Dems to take over Congress in 2007!!

Shoulda fired rummy before the election! Would that have made a difference? Alas, we'll never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad that this came out on the KatieFluff Show.
If it had been on ABC, NBC, or properly on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, people might have watched it!

:argh:
dbt
Get the news before it gets you.

PS: fuck the usual pugnacious bu$h.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Katie Fluff ~ that is so funny and perfect! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. IMO, no, he will stay. Rove, Cheney, Bush** and Gonzales make up
the brains of the entire Bush** administration. All decisions are made by this group. No chance he will leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Iglesias should had stated that he would not illegally provide privileged info
The media need to hype it up a bit as to to the fact that Iglesias could had been prosecuted if he revealed privileged information.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC