Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Attorney firing inquiry reaches impasse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:14 AM
Original message
LA Times: Attorney firing inquiry reaches impasse
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-usattys17mar17,1,6330941.story?coll=la-news-a_section&ctrack=1&cset=true

Attorney firing inquiry reaches impasse
The White House delays decisions on documents and testimony; the House Judiciary Committee threatens subpoenas.
By Richard A. Serrano and Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writers
March 17, 2007

WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats and the Bush administration hit an impasse Friday in the probe into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, with White House officials delaying decisions to turn over documents or allow officials to testify and the House Judiciary Committee threatening subpoenas to force them to comply.

As speculation mounted that Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales' job was in jeopardy, another Republican suggested it would be best if he stepped down. "It is ultimately the president's decision, but perhaps it would benefit this administration if the attorney general was replaced with someone with a more professional focus rather than personal loyalty," said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach). He also said there had been "a pattern of arrogance in this administration."

White House and Justice Department officials said no announcement was imminent on Gonzales' status.

Also Friday, a lawyer for D. Kyle Sampson, Gonzales' former chief of staff who has been at the center of the controversy, issued a statement seeking to dispel the notion that Sampson had withheld from superiors information about plans to fire U.S. attorneys.

"The fact that the White House and Justice Department had been discussing the possible replacement of several U.S. attorneys since approximately 2005 was well known to a number of other senior officials at the department, including others who were involved in preparing the department's testimony to Congress," Bradford Berenson said.

Berenson also took issue with the explanation that Gonzales offered Tuesday for Sampson's resignation. Gonzales told reporters that "the mistake" Sampson had made was "that information that he had was not shared with individuals within the department" who were going to testify before Congress.

Some members of Congress have criticized the Justice Department over what they said was misleading or incomplete testimony about the fired prosecutors.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC