Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems that voted for Gonzales' confirmation have some REAL explaining to do

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:40 AM
Original message
Dems that voted for Gonzales' confirmation have some REAL explaining to do
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 11:44 AM by fujiyama
Just sayin'....Wasn't it pretty obvious this guy was a hack from the beginning?

Then again, it looks like the usual suspects that sell out Dems on just about everything:

Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Salazar (D-CO)

Thing is, for all her boot licking of Bush, Landrieu is going to face a hell of a time trying to get reelected. And considering she'll never win over the RWers, she's probably alienated a fair number of the remaining liberals left in LA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Counciltucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. In their defense...
...he appeared to be better than Ashcroft, not that that's saying much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. True enough, and his confirmation was a certainty.
Landrieu is fairly conservtative.
We know about Liebermann.
Salazar may have been attempting to avoid problems with some of his constituents.

The rest? No idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. No idea? Let me give you a three-letter CLUE:
DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Ah. It was a conspiracy. That explains it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Compared to who else * could've nominated...
Gonzales may not have seemed too bad. He wasn't known as an extremist, as I recall. No one * would've nominated would've been good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:47 AM
Original message
I agree
but when you know the choice is bad anyways, why not atleast show unanimous disagreement with ANY of Bush's picks?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I see what you mean. But it's wastes time & $$$.
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 11:49 AM by indie_ana_500
There were other very important things going on. Could've been they thought, why drag it out? Bush might recall the nomination and name someone really really bad, and then what? I would think, well, better grab this one that doesn't seem too bad, or we might get someone worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Like John Breaux?
Dem. Breaux, a co-sponsor of the Medicare Reform Act, is possibly going to run for Governor of La.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, I heard about that
I've heard that both Landreiu and the governor are going to have a tough time. BTW is Blanco going to run again as well? How will post Katrina demographics affect politics in the state? I've heard it will be quite difficult for Dems to win statewide. Though I know Breux is popular.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Those guys almost always have some explaining to do
I think the citizens of their states have the real explaining to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. would you rather we had voted for Republicans?
I think you have some explaining to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Find and work for better candidates
Did you work in the last senatorial campaign?
Are you a member of PDA?
Did you mail, telephone and e-mail your senators?
I know most here at DU are active politically so the generalization is probably not applicable to you.

The problem with these senators is obvious in their voting records and statements.
Organizing for a grassroots alternative is a hope citizens of those states can work for.

They suck, and you know it, but without true choice you are left with voting for either
Republican full strength, or Republican lite like these 6 assholes.

Good luck in your battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd expect them to vote for Gonzales
When I think of Democrats of questionable loyalties, those 6 come to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Most of the Liberals in Lousiana…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Not sure I agree with you there, Andy.
It's my understanding that most of the folks in the 9th Ward didn't vote. If they had, Bush might well have never been elected in the first place.

(Note: I believe I read that about the voting....I'm not trying to make any kind of sweeping generalization.)

So they could've been liberal, conservative, or apolitical, and it wouldn't matter, if most of them didn't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. As I recall ...

As I recall Gonzalez was in the spotlight even before the nomination for his views on the "Unitary Executive". Gonzalez believes the president is an elected king so it is not surprising that he would sidestep the laws of congress to bend to any will of the executive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. have a call in to my idiot DINO (salazar) to ask why there has been nothing but silence from him on
his good buddy, gonzo the torturer. he does not bother to respond, any more than he bothered to respond about his silence on Building 18-- or his vote authorizing torture.

he is a mess, a fact of which I remind him regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Both Gonzales and Rice proved they were UNFIT for their offices - neither
should have received one Dem vote after 9-11 and Abu Ghraib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC