Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hume Launches New Smear: Valerie Plame Lied Under Oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:46 AM
Original message
Hume Launches New Smear: Valerie Plame Lied Under Oath
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/18/hume-plame-oath/

Hume Launches New Smear: Valerie Plame Lied Under Oath

Today on Fox News Sunday, Brit Hume continued his campaign to smear Valerie Plame Wilson. Previously, he had falsely said that it was “unlikely she was” covert.

Instead of apologizing this morning, he launched a new attack against Plame, claiming that she had lied under oath when she testified on Friday about whether she recommended her husband be sent to Niger to investigate Iraq’s supposed nuclear ambitions.

Hume said Plame’s testimony “flies in the face of the evidence” produced by the “bipartisan” Senate Intelligence Committee, which said that “she very much did have something to do with it, that she recommended him and that she put it in a memo.” Watch it at link:

Plame testified that she never suggested her husband for the Niger trip. “I did not recommend him, I did not suggest him, there was no nepotism involved — I didn’t have the authority,” she said.

Hume’s false claim originated from a statement attached to the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Iraq that was released in 2004. In an addendum to that report, Sens. Pat Roberts (R-KS), Christopher Bond (R-MO), and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) wrote definitively, “The plan to send the former ambassador to Niger was suggested by the former ambassador’s wife, a CIA employee.” The right-wing, including columnist Bob Novak, have taken the statement written by three Republican senators and falsely attributed it as the “unanimous” conclusion of the Senate report.

The three conservative senators based their claim on testimony by a CIA employee who appeared before the Senate Intel Committee. Plame revealed on Friday that the CIA employee later apologized to her “with tears in his eyes” because he said “his words had been twisted and distorted” by the senators. And in fact, the unnamed employee drafted a memo, asking that he be re-interviewed by the Senate to correct the record. His attempts to set the record straight were denied. On Friday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) asked to retrieve a copy of that memo:

REP. VAN HOLLEN: So, just so I understand, Mr. Chairman, if I could — so, there was a memo written by the officer, upon whose alleged testimony the Senate wrote its report that contradicts the conclusions –

MS. PLAME WILSON: Absolutely.

REP. VAN HOLLEN: — contradicts the conclusions from that report.

MS. PLAME WILSON: Yes, sir.

REP. VAN HOLLEN: Mr. Chairman, it seems to me that this committee should ask for that memo. And it bears directly on the credibility of the Senate report on this very, very important issue, which they’ve attempted to us to discredit Ambassador Wilson’s mission.

REP. WAXMAN: I think the gentleman makes an excellent point, and we will insist on getting that memo.

Transcript:

HUME: And the other thing that needs to be noted here is when she says that she had nothing to do with getting her husband the trip, that flies in the face of the evidence adduced by the Senate Intelligence Committee whose findings were released not on a partisan basis — the bipartisan findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which was that she very much did have something to do with it, that she recommended him and that she put it in a memo.

WALLACE: So she was lying under oath?

HUME: I think that there is reason to question her credibility on that point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good call, Brit.
What a total dumbass. Plame's status when she was outed is known with certainty by the CIA. If she was not covert, she would not have walked out of the Senate chambers without handcuffs.

Hume's imitation of journalism is tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hume is a horrendous man totally lacking in conscience..
I used to feel sorry for him (a bit) after hearing that his son had died from suicide. Now, I fully understand the son's actions.... It is the son, who I hope finds peace and the father I hope finds eternal anguish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fox Noise
The propaganda organ of the Confederate Republicon Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. If Valery Plame lied under oath she will be convicted of
perjury. If she told the truth one of the Bush cronies will by convicted of perjury. It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Maybe he meant to say Victoria Toensing lied under oath.
Brit's just confused. I mean, Valerie/Victoria, truth/lies...it's hard to keep it all straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here we have..
... a blowhard announcer accusing someone OF COMMITTING A CRIME.

She ought to be able to sue his ass right into skid row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. It doesn't matter what is in the memo from
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 11:00 AM by POAS
the CIA employee. When it contradicts the preconceived Rupublic notions they will make up another lie. Probably something like the CIA has it in for the Whitehouse or that the guy is probably a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. She had NO reason to lie
Why in the world would she perjure herself? To protect her husband? To protect some higher-up in the CIA? She's not there anymore, which is why she was allowed to finally testify. Civil servants, especially in the intelligence biz, value the idea of truth versus falsehood. Didn't she say that all CIA analysts would "rather be fired on the spot rather than make things up to push a political opinion"?

BTW, "covert status" means that, even if you are no longer active, your identity remains covert for several years afterward, to protect yourself, your agents, and the entire program. I believe that both Hanssen and Ames gave up the identities of CIA Agents and the Russians who were working with them to the KGB. So, yes, it's a dangerous profession. Even though she's "just a desk jockey" now, who's to say that the Iranian intel service couldn't come back and kill her, or her family, because of what she did in the past? Not to mention those Iranians who were talking to her. They're probably already dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. She testified that she had been out of the country on covert missions
within the past 5 years, and was controlling networks of active agents. That's about as active and covert as it gets.
Apparently, she could have gone overseas again at any time if her duties required it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Victoria Toesuck lied about that, too. Said VP didn't leave the country.
How in the hell would Vicki Toesuck know that? HUH???

Where's her ouija board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Put Roberts, Bond, and Hatch under oath, and question them about it.
They might just open themselves up to impeachment proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. i want to see the memo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Way to go Brit!
I'm sure the White House will welcome more testimony on the leak as cons try to snip at Plame's under-oath statements.

Let's haul them all back to Congress so Buxh can relive last friday over and over, like Groundhog Day.

Unfortunately, Hume's statements are only meant as a final word that party loyalists can take home with them. The rest of the world knows better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. I heard about the 'memo' a few years ago--but does it exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think it does, but she was doing work for someone that asked
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 12:43 PM by babylonsister
her to (her boss?), the content didn't originate from her. At least, that's what I got from her testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. My understanding of it is that the memo in question is from one of her co-workers
validating her story that she did -not- suggest her husband for the Niger mission..

The memo proves that the idea to send her husband on a fact finding mission to Niger didn't originate with her and that the email she sent has been taken out of context and used against her.

If Wilson's mission to Niger is seen as a "favor he did for his wife' and NOT an official fact finding mission undertaken at the behest of the VP... then the seriousness of the leak is vastly diluted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debs Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Again
My understanding from what I have read about this is there WAS a memo but it originated from her being ASKED if she thought her husband was a good choice for the mission and being TOLD to write up a recommendation. I believe this is what David Ensor was told by a high ranking CIA official
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. kand Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. thank god we have hume getting to the bottom of this
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 12:29 PM by xxqqqzme
incredibly important point. I have no doubt this is completely fair & balanced reporting. I mean hatch, roberts & bond writing a separate statement attached to the report, AFTER the committee signed off - how much more balanced can you get?

Theses rethugs certainly like their 'signing statements' don't they. If I recall, that senate committee found no criminal action in the outing of a covert agent - Did Plame testify before it? Guess scooter's guilty verdicts kind of blows that report all to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Wilson's should add Hume to the growing list of
defendants in their civil suit. Hume, the pathetic journalist wannabe, accused VP of perjury on national television, isn't that libel?


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. VPW needs to add the very stupid Mr. Hume to her lawsuit.
He has slandered her publically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. After it is revealed that they did in fact LIHOP 9-11
Brit Hume will be stating that they did so for good reasons, and that anyone who doesn't understand that simple fact must hate america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debs Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. My understanding about how that conclusion was reached
Is that she was ASKED if she thought her husband would be a good choice by a superior, she said he would then was told to write up a recommendation. Which she did and the testimony was reflective of what she wrote. Not having, or not getting into testimony, the backround about the ORIGIN of said memo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Brit Hume is the biggest piece of pile of shit on the Conservative side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. and Poppy's tennis partner
That's his biggest cred, isn't it? Poppy Bush's tennis partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. He denied he played tennis with Bush--to me
Around 1990 he was on CSPAN and I got through and asked him about this. He denied it. I have the tape somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. google shows almost 59,000 hits for the words
"hume bush tennis partner"

So I guess it must have been a non-denial denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Plame DIDN'T suggest her husband for the Niger trip
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 01:46 PM by rocknation
until someone ASKED if he'd be a good candidate. If what Hume is saying is that Plame initiated either the suggestion or the trip, he is slanderously wrong. A couple of (Republican) Senators "concluded" in a report that she initiated the trip? How do they know their conclusion is correct? That's not "evidence."

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. Get the memo and blow the Plame story wide open. Put Hatch, Roberts and
"Yosemite Sam" Kit Bond on the hot seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. I have not seen FOXNEWS Sunday yet but i want to know if Hume and W. Williams got into it
thats the only time i watch that show at the end when they have that panel on with Hume and Wan Williams getting into a shouting match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. Do you expect something different from the Republican news network? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. If memory serves, Hume was the moderator in a 2004 Dem. debate,
in which he behaved like the lying, smearing turd that he is. Which is exactly why the Nevada Dems. were finally right in taking away their debate from Faux. Fox will always deal with Dems. on the basis of what will be good for their RW masters, not in the interests of an evenhanded debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC