I swear, every single time they continue to say "She was not covert"
Phoebe Loosinhouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:02 PM
Original message |
I swear, every single time they continue to say "She was not covert" |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 02:03 PM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
anyone in hearing distance should just respond "and the Earth is flat."
They are denying a FACT. It doesn't deserve any more of a response then that.
edited spelling
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. GOP strategy= fool some of the people all of the time |
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. That worked for them for a few decades, but not any more. |
|
They have been exposed. Finally.
I'm glad I'm in a reality-based political party.
|
tbyg52
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It'll work for a lot of other things as well!
|
peacebird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Pierzin
(710 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
4. who R "they"? Specifics. None of MSM is doing justice,as usual. |
|
I watched CNN over last night and this morning, and thought they were actually going to talk about The Subject of Valerie Plame and her Official Status as a covert agent. Instead, they proceeded to talk about the transgender protester in pink. Any subject that will not further damage the neo-cons!
aaaarrrrg!
|
Cass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ooooh! That's a great response! |
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. They are obsessed with denying this fact..... |
|
because it is an impeachable offense to out a covert operative, correct? They're scared.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. It's all they've got, which is very good news. n/t |
mnhtnbb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Or maybe ask if their pants are on fire? Liar, liar.... |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. The GOP callers on Washington Journal |
|
... yesterday morning were pathetic. I don't think any of them actually watched the hearing; I believe one would have to draw them a map to CSPAN. But every single one them WITHOUT EXCEPTION parroted the mindless chatter downplaying this whole disgraceful mess.
It's really sad that people allow others to do their thinking for them.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. My reply: Was the company Brewster Jennings that she was |
|
the CEO of also not Covert? Brewster Jennings was a front for a covert Op investigating proliferation of WMDs. Novak exposed that company. Rove, Libby and Cheney also exposed that Covert Op. I call that Treason!
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. It was most definitely treason. |
|
That's why they are desperately trying to paint it as benign.
The Democrats should refer this to Fitz for prosecution of the WH for conspiracy and treason.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-18-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
13. that is a good one--my response has been, "HOW the F*** would YOU know--YOU don't have clearance to |
|
know"
after friday, we can also say, "what part of "her boss SAID she was" don't you understand?"
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.