Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Detailed analysis of how Clinton never committed perjury.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:06 PM
Original message
Detailed analysis of how Clinton never committed perjury.
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-clintonperjury.html

Many believe that Clinton committed perjury – that is, he lied under oath – during the Paula Jones deposition (January 17, 1998) and the Grand Jury (August 17, 1998). However, the term "perjury" has been thrown around so loosely that it is important to go over its definition.

Perjury occurs when a person takes an oath to tell the truth and then says something he knows to be false. The mere existence of error in someone’s testimony is not enough to prove perjury. The government must prove that the person intended to lie, rather than he was simply mistaken or confused over the facts. The law requires either another witness or some other evidence that supports the accusation of lying under oath. Furthermore, not all lying under oath is perjury. The lie must be material – that is, important or relevant to the case. A murder suspect who falsely testifies that he ate cereal in jail that morning cannot be prosecuted for perjury over that irrelevant lie.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Possumpoint Donating Member (937 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somehow
this post reminds me of the very old cartoon where a bald man with only one hair left goes for a haircut. Watching that barber split hairs was a work of art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Exactly
So sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bill Clinton just never went there he fessed up and took the bumps
...now, the BushCo gang is a different story, you watch how they split hairs over every lie. It is all coming over the following months and it has already begun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perjury should pertain to an actual offense too,
Not questions that don't pertain to any illegal wrongdoing like peeping-tom liar Kenneth Starr's shit was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's actually one of the points of the article.
That, in order to be perjury, the statement made has to be directly related to the matter at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. He should have told them to shove it.
His personal life was a red herring for the purposes of dragging his ass through the mud. Junior could have taught him a thing or two about refusing to answer questions and changing the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're absolutely right about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC