Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't there already a law saying the people can't lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Isn't there already a law saying the people can't lie
to Congress while Congress is doing its oversight duties? If not, it's an idea whose time has come. Any lies told to Congress are crimes whether or not the person makes the lies under oath.

Truth shouldn't require sworn testimony. Truth should be a requirement in all cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. 18 USC 1001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. thank you
glad thats on the books
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewoden Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. US code text here
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 > § 1001 Prev | Next

§ 1001. Statements or entries generally
How Current is This?

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. so even if there is no oath, Rove can be nailed?
so let him testify without an oath then. It would more likely empower him to lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Um... with no transcript or record, how exactly can you prove he lied?
See, that's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I didn't say no record, I said no oath
I could accept no oath on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Martha Stewart was convicted under 18 USC 1001 and served time for lying to Fed officials when not
under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. thank you again
I think the arrogant Rove will lie through his teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC