Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glen Greenwald: Congressional Republicans suddenly discover the need for oversight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:09 PM
Original message
Glen Greenwald: Congressional Republicans suddenly discover the need for oversight
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/

Congressional Republicans suddenly discover the need for oversight


snip//

Of course, this sudden discovery of the need for oversight was prompted only by highly public revelations of abuse. And the reason why all of this happened -- and this is but a tiny fraction of the lawbreaking and abuse going on -- is because Congressional Republicans spent the last six years purposely allowing the Executive branch to accumulate unlimited amounts of unchecked power, while they blocked every attempt (most of which were lame and half-hearted) by Congressional Democrats to exert oversight over how these powers were used.

Thus, the very same Congressional Republican caucus now pretending to be so shocked and upset over these abuses were the ones who spent the last six years enabling these very abuses. They vested these powers and then completely abdicated their responsibilities to exercise oversight.

And it was not mere abdication of their responsibilities of which they are guilty, but worse still, all-out attacks on those who warned of the dangers of allowing the Executive to exercise unchecked surveillance and other powers over Americans. Just look at the quotes from these Republican Congressmen -- "Do we have that many potential terrorists running around the country? If so, I'm really worried"; "America may be less safe, but the Constitution will be more secure" -- which are rather similar to the arguments made over the last six years by opponents of unchecked executive power.

Over the last six years, people who voiced these objections were repeatedly accused -- by Congressional Republicans and their party -- of being advocates of Terrorist Rights and being Allies of Al Qaeda as a result of those objections. Yet these are the same objections which Congressional Republicans -- now that the FBI's abuses have become inescapably clear -- are voicing in order to transform themselves from Guilty Parties into shocked and disappointed victims.

These are the same people who defended the President's right to eavesdrop on the telephone conversations of Americans in secret and with no oversight even though the law made that a felony, and then voted to legalize that unchecked eavesdropping. They did not want to investigate any reports of illegal behavior on the part of the administration with regard to a whole slew of abuses.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Awww, come on, the Republicans were into oversight!! They were all concerned about STEROIDS in
baseball, after all...while kids were dying in EyeRack, they were worried about juiced athletes!!! Hell, they broke into regular teevee to show THOSE 'important' hearings!!

But STILL--no network could spare the time to carry Al Gore's environmental testimony LIVE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm still livid the media whores didn't cover the Plame testimony, yet
they spent a week on ANS. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The people without CSPAN were totally screwed on that score.
We really do need "over the air" CSPAN. Even if it's on UHF channel God-Knows-What. It's a crime that the "gift" from the cable company is ONLY available to those who subscribe to EXPANDED basic cable. A sin, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And dish/direct satellite.
Of course, in order to get cspin one and two, one has to subscribe to a package beyond basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I even have digital cable.......
...and I don't even get CSPAN3!! I have to watch it on the internet if I want to watch something on CSPAN3.

I really think it's ridiculous.....I mean, I pay a lot of money for digital cable but I can't get CSPAN3!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I used to get it in DC, but here in the home of the cradle of liberty? Fuggedabout it!
Heaven forfend the damned cable baaastids have to give up a channel so we can see government at work! It's bad enough they have to fork over a community channel, so you can see the odd school commmittee meeting!

So don't feel bad, you're not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah, I know I'm not alone......it just sucks!
I have probably about 500 channels or more on digital cable but they just can't find a place to put another CSPAN channel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Born again republickers are so sickening.
Suddenly they are all budget hawks, constitutional scholars and public spirited holier than thou wankers.
We must never let our representatives forget-and they will-that these putrid excrescences from hades are the very worst of anti-American ideologues.
They are not for government by the people, but consider public office to be a reward for party loyalty and for dreaming up new ways to loot the common weal and devise ever worsening ways to add to the suffering of innocents.

People who choose to ally themselves with the republicker criminals are guilty of profound ignorance or are the victims of an anti-social pathology so deeply corrosive as to render them incapable of inclusion in a society of equals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC