Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E-mails on attorneys’ firings could impact privilege case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:08 PM
Original message
E-mails on attorneys’ firings could impact privilege case
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/e-mails-on-attorneys-firings-could-impact-privilege-case-2007-03-21.html

E-mails on attorneys’ firings could impact privilege case
By Susan Crabtree
March 22, 2007

As the White House prepares for a constitutional showdown over subpoenas of top administration aides to testify about the firings of U.S. attorneys, the viability of President Bush’s executive privilege argument may come down to the time-worn question: How much did the president know, and when did he know it?

Democratic sources say that investigators in Congress have taken note of a brief e-mail exchange, released by the administration Monday night, which touches on this topic. But the exchange raises more questions than it answers.

In an e-mail dated Nov. 15, 2006, Kyle Sampson, former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, asked then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers and her deputy, William Kelley, whether he had the green light to go forward with the firing plan.

Miers responded that she was “not sure whether this will be determined to require the boss’s attention.” Her e-mail ended with the words: “We will see. Thanks.”

Sampson, who resigned last week, responded with a critical question: “Who will determine whether whether this requires the President’s attention?”

The rest of the 3,000 documents the administration released Monday night do not answer that question. In fact, the documents appear to contain only one e-mail between mid-November and Dec. 4, which brings into question whether any e-mails between those dates contained information relating to the president’s role. The Department of Justice released additional documents yesterday afternoon, but they provided no additional information on the issue.

Democrats want to know what role, if any, President Bush played in the plan. They also want to know who pushed the plan and who signed off on the list of attorneys slated for firing.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't you heard?
Every single White House e-mail dated during the missing period contained information of a highly sensitive nature, and to release it would be exposing national secrets to terrorists.

In fact, so confidential were those messages, that White House paper shredders and fireplaces have been working overtime ensuring all have been destroyed. Computer hard disks have been wiped clean of all data and reformatted to ensure this sensitive information does not get out.

Why do you hate America?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralis Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't ISP's have them?
I was under the impression that the ISP would have all those e-mails. Why not obtain them through the ISP! That is what this administration has been doing all along under the guise of National Security! After all the age old cry of the oppressor is about internal security!

Ralis

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC