Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hell - SUBPOENA BUSH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:54 PM
Original message
Hell - SUBPOENA BUSH
Credit to this suggestion goes to OPIHIMOIMI who put in on a previous thread.

snow says bush has no recollection of any chit chat about the attorney firings but bush wants to protect his conversations relative to the attorneys firings with his staff members. Which is it? What did you know and when did you know it can only be answered by the drug addicted, corporate criminal, military deserting scum who is loved and admired by the conservatives in your neighborhood.

IF HE DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE PLANS TO FIRE THE ATTORNEYS WHICH CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM ABOUT THE FIRINGS MUST BE PROTECTED?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hell plans to.
At least sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's right!
Subpoena NOW! let's all get that message out there. "What did Bush know, and when did he know it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought the request had to come from the Prez...
If it's the president's job to hire and fire (or ask for resignation) then how the hell could this have all gone on behind his back?

Too many lies to cover up, eh BushCo? Dumbasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They obviously didn't listen to Mark Twain who said
ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH AND YOU WILL NEVER HAVE TO REMEMBER ANYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. And here's what Dan Bartlett had to say on the subject last week
Bush didn't know anything about the attorney firings - BUT HE APPROVED THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They can make good use of that one!
Bush didn't know anything about WMDs in Iraq, but he approved the war.

Bush didn't know anything about outing a covert CIA agent, but he approved her outing.

Bush didn't know anything about no bid contracts, but he approved them.

Bush don't know nothin' bout nothin'. Sure doesn't seem to be very useful, does he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tony Snow Says * Will Go Testify Voluntarily If And Only If......
it is not under oath. No notes or transcripts are taken. It is behind closed doors. Only a few select Senators/Congressmen are present. That Dick Cheney can come with him. And here's the kicker - they don't ask him any questions.

No need for a subpoena. No need for a show trial. No need for a witch hunt.

This is a generous offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And the "questioners"
will be executed immediately after the "questioning."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. And also Dick Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exactly. I'd like to know why he doesnt want his employees under oath.
Edited on Thu Mar-22-07 02:28 PM by Dr Fate
I think most DEMS are too frightened of him to even hint at the notion, but one can day-dream.

I'm sure a "Dry powder" Democrat has already crafted 10 volumes of excuses in advance for why we cant even try it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC