Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Gift To the Repubs, Young And Old

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:56 PM
Original message
A Gift To the Repubs, Young And Old
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070322/internet_blocking.html?.v=13

AP
U.S. Judge Blocks 1998 Online Porn Law
Thursday March 22, 10:39 am ET
By Maryclaire Dale, Associated Press Writer
U.S. Judge Blocks 1998 Law Criminalizing Web Porn That Reaches Kids


PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- A federal judge on Thursday dealt another blow to government efforts to control Internet pornography, striking down a 1998 U.S. law that makes it a crime for commercial Web site operators to let children access "harmful" material.
ADVERTISEMENT


In the ruling, the judge said parents can protect their children through software filters and other less restrictive means that do not limit the rights of others to free speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. beyond the Mark Foley jokes
how is this a gift to Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well...........
They seem to be a perverted bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. true. But my point was that I don't really agree with the idea of
internet censorship. I'm fine with cracking down on predatory behavior and child pornography, etc. but I kind of like the way the internet is as far as a medium of communication for many.

The more people insist on control, the more it will become like TV: beholden to corporate interests. It's like the idea of people giving up Constitutional rights and other freedoms for security. While I understand the motives, I don't agree with the enaction.

Honestly i am not that familiar with this case, so maybe I am speaking out of my butt, and I don't want to come across as attacking you because I am not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Free speech or free voyeurism, the right to talk or the right to be a peeping Tom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC