Does Anybody Have Any Quotes By Pat Buchanan During The Clinton....

[global1]

era regarding 'executive privilege' and having Clinton's confidant's testify on Capitol Hill?

I can't believe that Pat had the same feelings then as now. It would be good to stuff his words down his throat.

He claims Rove can't be called up to testify.

[Iwasthere]

1. hmmmm, I have a few tapes of the actual Clinton hearings

They were donated to school along with a bunch of other junk. I will take a look at them tonight.

[tridim]

2. Pat is such a bitch.

I can't stand listening to his faux outrage as of late. It's obvious that HE's the hypocrite he keeps referring to.

[Roland99]

3. Buchanan in 1998.

http://www.buchanan.org/pa-98-1222.html


BTW, Clinton was pursued over a PERSONAL LIFE dalliance.

Bushco is being investigated over CRIMES AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION and FEDERAL LAW!!

[On the Road]

4. What Really Frosted Me

was that Ken Starr even went after lawyer-client privilege on the basis that Clinton's lawyer was on the government payroll. If I recall correctly, they actually got precedent overturned. And the GOP was all behind him.

And now everyone's pretending like none of that ever happenned.

[formercia]

5. His latest tirade:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54841

Congress' attack on the presidency
Posted: March 23, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

If the Senate and House judiciary committees issue subpoenas for Karl Rove and other White House aides to testify to their roles in the firing of the eight U.S. attorneys, President Bush should defy the subpoenas. He should accept the contempt citations and fight it all the way to the Supreme Court.

Indeed, he has a duty to do so. For Bush is today the custodian of an office that is the subject of assault by a partisan and hostile Congress.

See related thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3177507&mesg_id=3177507