Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem Congressman Rips Washington Post For Helping Land Us In "Stupid, Ill-Advised War"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:31 AM
Original message
Dem Congressman Rips Washington Post For Helping Land Us In "Stupid, Ill-Advised War"
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/03/dem_rep_obey_ri.php

Dem Congressman Rips Washington Post For Helping Land Us In "Stupid, Ill-Advised War"
March 23, 2007 -- 11:58

Oh, man -- this is really a great one. This morning The Washington Post published the latest in a string of dishonest, misleading editorials about the House Dems' Iraq bill.

Today, on the floor of the House of Representatives during debate over the bill, Dem Rep. David Obey tore into the Post devastatingly hard, making the case that we shouldn't be listening to the Post about the bill now given how disastrously wrong their cheerleading for the war has turned out to be. Obey blamed the paper's editorial page for everything from spewing Republican talking points to being partly responsible for getting us stuck in Iraq, and when he was done, all that was left was a pile of shredded Hiatt.

View it at link:

Here's a partial transcript:

Let me submit to you the problem we have today is not that we didn't listen enough to people like The Washington Post. It's that we listened too much. They endorsed going to war in the first place. They helped drive the drumbeat that drove almost two-thirds of the people in this chamber to vote for that misbegotten, stupid, ill-advised war that has destroyed our influence over a third of the world. So I make no apology if the moral sensibilities of some people on this floor, or the editorial writers of The Washington Post, are offended because they don't like the specific language contained in our benchmarks or in our timelines.

What matters in the end is not what the specific language is. What matters is whether or not we produce a product today that puts pressure on this Administration and sends a message to Iraq, to the Iraqi politicians that we're going to end the permanent long-term dead end babysitting service. That's what we're trying to do. And if The Washington Post is offended about the way we do it, that's just too bad.


That must have felt pretty good. It's about time someone did this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, there are even more aholes than usual at the WP editorial board today.
Obey ripped several new ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. We need more like him:
"long-term dead end babysitting service"....great line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. "...permanent long-term dead end babysitting service."
Who is this man? I like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC