Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Justice Official Won’t Testify on Prosecutor Firings (Monica Goodling invoking 5th Amendment)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:47 PM
Original message
NYT: Justice Official Won’t Testify on Prosecutor Firings (Monica Goodling invoking 5th Amendment)
WASHINGTON, March 26 — A lawyer for a Justice Department official involved in the controversial firings of eight United States attorneys said today that his client would not testify on Capitol Hill because she is convinced she would not be treated fairly.

The official, Monica Goodling, the Justice Department’s liaison to the White House, is invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and so will decline to answer “any and all questions regarding the firings,” her lawyer, John M. Dowd, said.

But Ms. Goodling’s refusal does not signal that she has anything to hide, Mr. Dowd told the Senate Judiciary Committee’s chairman, Senator Patrick J. Leahy. Rather, Mr. Dowd said, it is a recognition of the “hostile and questionable environment” that has been spawned by the controversy.

“For example, you, Mr. Chairman, have concluded that the attorney general and deputy attorney general ‘failed to tell Congress the whole truth about this matter under oath,’ ” Mr. Dowd told Mr. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/26/washington/26cnd-attorneys.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

WOW ~~ looks like the first one who is afraid of telling what he/she knows. Maybe the could offer her immunity? I frankly do not believe the reason why she says she is invoking the 5th Amendment ~~ the ONLY reason alloweable is to avoid self-incrimination.

Popcorn, anyone? :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of these days Leahy is going to get some respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Respect???
LOL, I am just glad they seem to FEAR him!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is John M Dowd a bit "High End" for this client?
Unless I'm confusing him with someone else, it's a pretty heavy gun for someone in her position. Or maybe somebody else is picking up the tab.

Anybody have the scoop on him? Has he defended high ranking Republicans accused of corruption?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He would be considered, IMO, a VERY heavy hitter.
We are not talking someone who does DUI defenses ~~ not by a long shot. I have heard his name and I know of him. A lot of white collar crime defense. IIRC, he was involved in one of the first RICO cases ~~ but as a prosecutor. He is mid 60s or thereabouts and tons of experience.

I have no clue what his fees are or if Monica G can afford them. But...some lawyers do cases for the publicity when they are high profile even if the fees are not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC