Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales: I Did Nothing Wrong, But My Staff...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:38 PM
Original message
Gonzales: I Did Nothing Wrong, But My Staff...
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002882.php

Gonzales: I Did Nothing Wrong, But My Staff...
By Paul Kiel - March 26, 2007, 7:29 PM

From an interview tonight with NBC:

ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES: I asked for their resignation not for improper reasons. I would never have asked for their resignations to interfere with a public corruption case or in any way to interfere with an ongoing investigation. I just wouldn't do that. And if you look carefully at the documentation we've provided to Congress, there's no evidence of that....

I directed the Department officials participate in interviews and hearings before the Congress. As I've indicated, I've asked OPR to be involved, to work with the Office of Inspector General so we can reassure the American public that nothing improper happened here. I've got nothing to hide in terms of what I've done. And we now want to reassure the American public that nothing improper happened here.

If I find out that, in fact, any of these decisions were motivated, the recommendations to me were motivated for improper reasons to interfere with the public corruption case, there will be swift and -- there will be swift and decisive action. I can assure you that.

PETE WILLIAMS: Meaning people would be fired?

ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES: Absolutely. Because there is no place for that. Our prosecutors have to-- there has to be no question about the integrity, the professionalism, undue influence of prosecutions in connection with public corruption kinds of cases. And if I find out that any of that occurred here involving the Department of Justice officials, yes, they will be removed.


Gonzales also explains the discrepancy between his March 13 statement that "I was not involved in any discussions about what was going on" and the revelation that he participated in just such a meeting about what was going on ten days before the firings.

What he really meant, he explains, was that he wasn't involved in the nitty-gritty: "I was never focused on specific concerns about United States Attorneys as to whether or not they should be asked to resign." And no wonder. The reasons kept changing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't fire them but if I did I didn't do it someone else did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ahhh.....so he was there....but he didn't pay attention. Right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He was playing snake through the whole meeting
I can relate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. So Monic Goodling is to be the patsy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. The operative phrase being:
"And if you look carefully at the documentation we've provided to Congress, there's no evidence of that."

And here's what he didn't say:

"...because *we* looked at it very carefully before providing it, and made DAMN sure that no evidence was included in the documentation we've provided."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good god, he just can't help but contradict himself
First he says that he would *NEVER* ask for the resignation for improper reasons!! How dare you imply that I would?!?!

...but, well, I wasn't *really* involved in the nitty-gritty of evaluating who would be asked to resign...

Those two positions seem mutually exclusive to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. He got that line from his asshole boss (remember Plame?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, Gonzo. If they were fired improperly...
...you're going to see to it that they're brought back on and given new four-year terms, right? Right?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. The AG has no power to ask US Attorneys to resign.
Assistant US Attorneys, yes. But not US Attorneys themselves. That power resides only in the President.

So where is this "I" from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. How weird--he asked for their resignations for "proper" reasons, but
someone on his staff made "improper" recommendations. Either way, they were gunning for specific attorneys, so the result would be the same, "proper" or "improper" reasons notwithstanding. But Gonzo doesn't have to worry his little head about the whole mess, as he wasn't involved in the nitty-gritty. Thanks for clearing that up, Berto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Didn't bushwad say he was going to fire anyone involved in the Plame leak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Reason #8459 to not believe anything this admin says. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds like a personal problem to me, Mr. Gonzales.
:evilgrin:

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. "But My Staff..." Wouldn't that have applied to Clinton ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, bullshit.
What were you doing at the hour-long meeting, Gonzo? Playing games on your cell phone? something as big as this and you had no fucking idea? You should be fired for incompetence. Why do they think that if they use the "I had no idea that all the people that work for me were doing this" is any sort of a credible excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. I thought the quote would be
"I did nothing wrong, but my staff are idiot mother-fuckers!"

Damn, disappointed again... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC