Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Lott Said Claiming Executive Privilege Makes WH ‘Look Like They Are Hiding Something’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:25 PM
Original message
Flashback: Lott Said Claiming Executive Privilege Makes WH ‘Look Like They Are Hiding Something’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/26/lott-hypocrisy-exec-priv/

Flashback: Lott Said Claiming Executive Privilege Makes WH ‘Look Like They Are Hiding Something’

Yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS) defended the Bush administration’s refusal to allow Karl Rove and other top White House aides to testify before Congress under oath, in public, and with a recorded transcript, claiming Bush had a “right to executive privilege.”

LOTT: The question is are the Democrats in the Senate interested in information or confrontation. In my mind, I think if the president would agree for his close advisers in the White House to testify before Congress under oath, he’d be making a huge mistake. There is a thing called executive privilege.

Watch it at link:

A vigorous defender of executive privilege today, Lott — like Tony Snow — has flip-flopped on executive privilege. Lott led the charge against Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky saga, seeking out everything from tapes to sworn testimony from the White House. In March 1998, Lott appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press and lambasted the Clinton White House for invoking executive privilege:

LOTT: I think they’ve made a mistake by . I think it will damage the credibility. It looks like they are hiding something, so I think they shouldn’t have done it. I think it’s an improper use, and the courts will have to decide whether or not that’s a proper use. And it may wind up in the Supreme Court, like it did in the Watergate matter.

As Think Progress has noted, Clinton was far more transparent than Bush when Congress requested that his aides testify, allowing 31 of his top aides to appear in sworn testimony in front of Congress compared to Bush’s one.

Lott was exactly right — invoking executive privilege makes the Bush White House “look like they are hiding something.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. And George W. bUsh said "the President should set a timeline for troop withdrawal"
But that's the republic party; "do as we say, not as we do, coz we be the biggest hypocrites on the planet!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Republicans get away with this double talk because they are corrupt..
they lie...the Republicans have always had something to hide and have always had issues they have tried to cover up..Think about it ..One could trace these facts all the way back to the 30's.
They have a double standard in politics and they get away with it because they have the corporate right wing media to spread their propaganda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They also get away with it coz their followers are dumber than bloody dirt.
You have to be stupid to be a republic and accept getting conned, fooled, tricked, duped and lied to over & over & over & over & over & over & over & over & over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just like him saying we can support the troops without supporting the President
The man is smart I tell you. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hypocrite Rethugs! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't Lott once say something about supporting the troops without supporting the president too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. now. lets all send this to Mr. Lott.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Berenson (Sampson's attny) and Dowd (Goodling's) attny both know
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 09:34 PM by EVDebs
that what Bushco is trying to hide is the Cunningham/DOD/CIA/GOP $ money scheme. If that ever gets fully investigated the GOP will forever be out of power in this country. Not about 'executive privilege', 'national security', 'doing the public's business'...just pure avarice followed by corruption in office.

They ARE hiding something. Ya Think ?

CIA official quits, FBI probes role in defense contracts
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/08/AR2006050801615.html

Hilltop High grads Foggo, Wilkes were 'like kindred spirits'
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/cunningham/20070214-9999-1n14bios.html

Wilke's connections to Iran Contra funding World Finance and his pal Foggo, and judge ruling limited access to 'state secrets' b.s. in order to protect the ability of the public to 'follow the money' shows that GOP keeps it's money/intell/defensecontractor money-machine intact for another election cycle.

If Dems are dumb enough to let this keep going on then Bush really might be smarter than they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC