Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mindful of Past, Clinton Cultivates the Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:49 AM
Original message
Mindful of Past, Clinton Cultivates the Military
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/us/politics/27brass.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Mindful of Past, Clinton Cultivates the Military

By PATRICK HEALY
Published: March 27, 2007

Of all the early problems Bill Clinton faced as president, few stand out to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as more frustrating and avoidable than his rocky relationship with the military, her advisers say.

During his 1992 campaign, Mr. Clinton was attacked for avoiding the Vietnam draft and organizing antiwar marches in the 1960s. After taking office, his early focus on gay men and lesbians in the military drew sharp criticism from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Colin L. Powell, and other officers. Even his ability to salute properly was called into question.

Mrs. Clinton, to use a phrase, has been practicing her salute. As a senator and now as a presidential candidate, she has cultivated relationships with generals and admirals, prepped herself on wartime needs and strategy, and traveled to Iraq and Afghanistan.

“I think eight years in the White House, traveling the world and seeing the United States military doing the nation’s business, and now her time in the Senate, has given her a significant appreciation of the military that maybe her husband didn’t have before the White House,” said Jack Keane, the retired general and former Army vice chief of staff who has become close to the senator.

For Mrs. Clinton, exhibiting a command of military matters is not just about learning from her husband’s experience. It could be vital to her, as a woman seeking to become a wartime commander in chief, to show the public that she is comfortable with military policy and culture — and with the weight of responsibility that accompanies life-and-death decisions.

It is also part of an effort to shed the image some voters hold of her as an antimilitary liberal, defined by her opposition to the Vietnam War and, now, by her criticism of the Bush administration’s conduct of the war in Iraq.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day
the bogus war on terror is over and the military will be used properly and for defense of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. even then
it will be important for whoever our Commander in Chief is to have something of a relationship with and understanding of the military. The relationship with the people who know it as their life's work will aid in getting the Troops what they truly need and an understanding of it, to me, indicates a respect for it ... unlike bush who seems to think everything and everyone in the military is made of plastic and moves where he wants it to move and is put away at the end of the day in a big box under his bed.

I hope the other candidates take her lead and build the necessary understanding with the military as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. For some she's defined by her constant SUPPORT of Bush's military decisions c2002-2006
where she stayed closer to Bush on military strategy than to her party's 2004 nominee.

She also refused to back up Dems like Wes Clark and again her party's nominee John Kerry calling for Rumsfeld to go in 2003 and 2004.

Earlier she refused to back up Kerry's attack on Bush's military decisions at Tora Bora, the point where the US had the BEST opportunity to crush Bin Laden AND Al Qaeda at a time and in a way acceptable to the world.

She stayed quiet and would NOT side with the truth about Tora Bora or Rumsfeld's incompetence, even after Abu Ghraib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The military will repay her by voting against her. They cant stand her.
She can vote with Republicans and vote pro-military all she wants- the Military cant stand her and will never support her-I'm sure they all think she is a Liberal or something. She just cant win when it comes to those votes, no matter what she does.

It's really not fair, to be honest- but since I dont like her, I could care less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's not fair, but she wasn't fair joining Bush and McCain's LIES against Kerry
ESPECIALLY when she and everyone else in DC know well that Kerry has worked his ENTIRE ADULT LIFE to support the troops and the military in the most substantive ways a public servant can.

There is a serious FLAW in Hillary's character to join Bush and McCain in their lying attack against John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC