Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REMEMBER THIS SNEAKY 2005 LAW as more and more whistleblowers come forward:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 12:41 PM
Original message
REMEMBER THIS SNEAKY 2005 LAW as more and more whistleblowers come forward:
Posted by cyberpj
Wed Jul 20th 2005, 09:59 AM

This is an outrage and happened right under our noses with no real press coverage.

You can be sure it was created, handed off and passed surreptitiously for the benefit of Halliburton, Bechtel, Blackwater et. al and will soon be used to save them.

U.S. judge limits use of fraud law against Iraq contractors

By Erik Eckholm The New York Times
WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 2005

A federal judge has issued a ruling that will limit the applicability of a critical antifraud statute against corporate contractors in Iraq.

Judge T.S. Ellis 3rd of U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, held on Monday that the False Claims Act did not apply to the many contractors who were paid by the American occupation authority using Iraqi oil money.


The False Claims Act offers large rewards to corporate insiders who reveal misdeeds, and huge financial penalties can be imposed on errant companies. It is widely regarded as the government's most potent weapon against contractor fraud.

The district court decision, which is the first to provide guidelines in what has been a legal void, could derail some whistle-blower lawsuits that are in their early stages and still under seal, experts in the field of procurement law declared.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/07/12/news/fraud.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. read his ruling closely.
"""did not apply to the many contractors who were paid by the American occupation authority using Iraqi oil money."""

that says to me that contractors that took taxpayer money are still liable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And how does one find out that info? I'll wager the big boys got Iraqi oil money -
- even if they didn't really.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did they take the tons of cash they flew into Iraq, convert it to the
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 01:21 PM by higher class
Iraqi currency and pay from it,... purposely? Anyone know the history of the Iraqi currency since say 1999?

By the way - they would have not cared about a deflated conversion if they knew they might save billions in lawsuit awards in the future - from handling depleted uranium, insufficient guards, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sounds about right for the way they've set up everything else AND knowing how experience they are at
MONEY LAUNDERING.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC