Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Draws Strong Criticism of Prosecutors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:01 PM
Original message
Gonzales Draws Strong Criticism of Prosecutors
Source: NY Times

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales endured blunt criticism Tuesday from federal prosecutors who questioned the firings of eight United States attorneys, complained that the dismissals had undermined morale and expressed broader grievances about his leadership, according to people briefed on the discussion.

About a half-dozen United States attorneys voiced their concerns at a private meeting with Mr. Gonzales in Chicago.

.....

On Wednesday, the Justice Department released more than 200 additional pages of e-mail messages and other documents and sent a letter to lawmakers saying that it had given Congress inaccurate information in an earlier letter that asserted that Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, had played no role in the removals.

Read more: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x528534



What a day. Difficult to keep up with this story!!
Here are many DU discussions, articles, links, "dumps" and more, including admissions of LIES:

Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978#528951

Thanks to cal04 for catching the story:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x528534
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
Don't these prosecuters realize that they serve to pleasure the Prez?

Ingrates.

(Oh, OK :sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't you read? W's replacement of his own appointed
reeks of obstruction of justice and an attempt by the WH to take over the independency of the DOJ.

They do take an oath to serve the Constitution not the president.

Sorry, I missed your sarcasm sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Obstruction of Justice, you say. I've been thinking about that
question tonight >>> when does removal of US attorneys for partisan political purposes

rise to the level of OoJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC