Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clever Chris Matthews and "Stalwart" Margaret Carlson and Pat Buchanan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:02 PM
Original message
Clever Chris Matthews and "Stalwart" Margaret Carlson and Pat Buchanan
go after the Fred Thompson Candidacy!

They LOVE IT! THEY ARE THRILLED BY IT!

Tweety is now becoming disenchanted with Giuliani so he's "morphed over" to Fred Thompson...from Hollywood...who could be the NEW REAGAN!

Pat Buchanan and Margaret Carlson laugh it up ...like they were in a "hangover" from last nights "Whore Media Academy Awards Dinner" where Karl Rove laughed it up with David (Media Whore) Gregory and an African-American who looked like he was dancing in a "Mintrel Show in an old Hollywood Silent from DW Griffith" going along with the whole crowd.

BUT...it was about Fred Thompson as the "charming new Reagan."

(COMMENT: I know that the Media is cynical and that many of us here on DU are cynical, also, but OMG!
I don't see us DU'ers as WHORING the way the MSM and MATTHEWS/BLITZER do!

It's beyond disgusting how the GAME is reported since Roone Arlidge was hired by ABC to "TURN AROUND BORING MEDIA COVERAGE" and make it "more like Sports Coverage."

American People have suffered because of Roone's emphasis on taking out "boring coverage" into the "sports/super star, who's Up and Down and the STATS COVERAGE!

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Buchanan's an asshole. Has he apologized for calling Dixie Chicks "stupid bimbos" yet?
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 05:06 PM by Hissyspit
Since they knew exactly what they were talking about?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. That will happen when
Buchanan apologizes for being a raqcist pos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tweety is probably impressed that Thompson's wife is 25+ years younger
than Thompson. 2nd wife, of course. Family values, and all that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Either that or he has seen
Fred Thompson in a flight suit.:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually, I think its his third wife
... but who's counting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No, she's his second wife.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I wonder who will be his VP? "Gopher"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Boy that's just what this country needs is a "NEW REAGAN"
Hello Canada? Got room for 2 more? PLEEEEEASE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Margaret Carlson was rumored to have...uh...been "linked" to him
romantically. To which I say: EEEEEEEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. rumor had it he was.......
On the Republican side, Sen. Fred Thompson is said to have hurt his vice-presidential chances when his name was linked romantically to that of Margaret Carlson. The Time columnist and "Capital Gang" regular is reportedly too liberal for George W. Bush. Thompson's standing was not enhanced when gossips said he was simultaneously involved with another woman.

http://toaaw.typepad.com/toaaw/2007/03/jumping_in_on_t.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Then Margaret really oughta refrain from commenting or promoting him--
not really an objective issue for her, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Amazingly Cruel for Tweety to have her on commenting about him, then.
When the Media starts to eat their own with viciousness...what could be next?

I had no idea about the Carlson/Thompson liason.. But, she's not been on Tweety recently...and I imagine some hip producer thought it would be oh so cute to have her on to wink and nod with Tweety.

It's all about THEM and their "insider jokes" these days. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. You are sooooo jaded, KoKo01
It's all show biz...and it's bad show biz at that.

Fred Thompson: the charming new Reagan. That's hillarious. It sounds like they are selling pet food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It may be bad show biz, but it's bad show biz that's worked before.
Both Reagan and Dubya were sold like pet food as plainspoken regular guys who could rise above their intellectual shortcomings and rely on their homespun common sense and smartypants fat cat advisors to get the presidentin' job done.

At least Reagan was the geniune leader of a grassroots political movement and spent his years in California formulating policy and learning to negotiate with friends and opponents. Bush was a phony from the git-go, taking little interest in being governor and spending his entire tenure simply building his resume, giving out school-killing tax cuts, and acting bipartisan in a state with pretty tame Democrats.

I've been thinking for months that the Republicans wouldn't ever be satisfied with any of the existing candidates. Every one of them is either unacceptable to the fundy base or a second-stringer unacceptable to the boardroom cats who write the fat campaign checks. Thompson is the newest flavor of the month. They'll try him out for a while and, if it sells, they'll run him. I want to ridicule the old coot, but the fact is that he may be the real deal as far as packageable candidates go.

We must find a way to counter the threat of this TV-star nominee. He will sell and he very well could win if nominated. The only sane strategy is to fight fire with fire. If the Republicans nominate Fred Thompson, we need to immediately fight back by nominating Patrick Dempsey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. What's wrong with Martin Sheen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Not eligible. He's already served two terms as showbiz president.
You don't want another FDR, do you? My God, what would that do to America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have a dream
as a woman formerly from Tennessee....

Where is Fred Thompson from and what distant 2000 election bells are ringing? Think about a picture we have seen of the "angry mob" in Florida banging on the doors to shut down the recount. The picture was eventually blown up, and the identities of the so-called protestors numbered and their names revealed. Their employment was also identified. One angry protestor was identified as an aid to Senator Fred Thompson from Tennessee. Question: what picture am I talking about?

What other dark horse candidate is being rumored as someone who might run, also from Tennessee. We discuss him often, and sometimes extremely fondly, here at the DU. This dark horse has an associaton with the above-discussed picture and possessed a keen interest in identifying members of the "angry mob." Who is that man?

Here is my dream. Two guys from Tennessee, one representing the Republicans, and representing the Democrats seek to capture the presidency in 2008. One will win, and one will not. Picture that! I think you know how my dream ends ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. This is the pic:
Edited on Fri Mar-30-07 10:19 AM by Clark2008


And, being from Tennessee, I like your dream, but I believe it would end in a nightmare. I had hopes for Tennessee, but after the Ford fiasco, I'm guessing Thompson would beat Gore in this state. That's not to say Gore wouldn't win the presidency. I'm not sure about that against Thompson. My crystal ball is murky - but I don't think Gore would win Tennessee over Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC