Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freep.com: Revisions can help counter intimidation from employers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 07:12 PM
Original message
Freep.com: Revisions can help counter intimidation from employers

http://freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070327/OPINION02/703270336/1070/OPINION02

Revisions can help counter intimidation from employers

March 27, 2007

BY MARV RUSSOW

The system under which workers now decide whether to join or form a union is based on a 70-year-old law. It came from an economy that is very different from today's, and instead of protecting the rights of workers to organize or join unions, it frequently thwarts those rights.

In order to bring the National Labor Relations Act into the 21st Century, the U.S. House recently passed the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which is now before the Senate.

I support its passage, but since I am president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 951 with more than 30,000 members here in Michigan, that is probably not surprising. Of course, I believe in unions and in worker rights.

Even more than that, however, I believe in democracy. At a time when the old social contract has been demolished by globalization and the enormous growth of corporate power, I believe it is even more important now than it was back in the 1930s to have democracy -- real democracy -- in the workplace.

EFCA can do something about that. The bill is designed to protect workers from the lopsided, coercive powers that many employers use to subvert democratic voting. Irresponsible employers fire and harass union supporters. They threaten job loss through plant closure or by moving work out of the facility where a union vote is taking place. They pledge to make wages and benefits worse if workers form a union.

Because of the structural power that comes with being the employer, they can make and carry out such threats in a way that distorts the voting process.

FULL article at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC