Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Clinton: Endorsements in New Hampshire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 08:45 PM
Original message
Senator Clinton: Endorsements in New Hampshire
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/03/hillarys_new_hampshire_edge.html

March 29, 2007
Chris Cillizza

Hillary's New Hampshire Edge
No candidate running for president in 2008 has a bigger target on his or her back than New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). Every appearance Clinton makes is scrutinized, every speech is parsed.

Under this harsh microscope, it's easy to overlook the successes Clinton has had since declaring her bid for president.No success is larger -- and more unnoticed -- than the campaign team Clinton has recruited in New Hampshire.

>
State House Majority Leader Mary Jane Wallner is also supporting Clinton, a key endorsement in a state where there are 400 state House members (yes, you read that right) -- each of whom is courted incessantly by presidential contenders. In the days following Wallner's endorsement earlier this month, 16 more state House members signed on with Clinton.


Organization is everything in presidential politics. Clinton made major strides to bolstering her team in Iowa earlier this week by winning the endorsement of former Gov. Tom Vilsack and clearly has the best operation in New Hampshire. Does this mean she is a shoo-in for the nomination? Absolutely not. But, what it does mean is that those observers predicting Clinton's downfall already are vastly misreading the reality on the ground.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting.
Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. She may get the nomination due to
money and name recognition and buying off endorsers ala Vilsack and splintering of the anti-Hillary vote -- but she will LOSE iin the general - no matter how competent she may be.

I fear her nomination - while, of course I will vote for her, I will do so with no enthusiasm at all - "swift boating" will descend to new levels ---- and succeed despite antipathy for Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC