This is a great and welcome editorial. It is past time this paper held the Congressman from the 12th district of Florida to account for his actions. He has shown his immaturity too often, and he has shown his loyal devotion to Bush too often. He is 32 years old, and already 3rd in line in the House GOP.
The Plane TruthOn Feb. 1, The Washington Times published a story, using anonymous sources, saying House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had demanded "routine access to military aircraft" for trips back to her district in California. The story said Rep. J. Dennis Hastert, Pelosi's Republican predecessor, had used a military aircraft for trips back to his Illinois district after the Sept. 11 attacks. Subsequent stories in The Washington Times, again quoting anonymous sources, said Pelosi had also demanded a large aircraft capable of flying nonstop across the country.
Those stories caused Republicans to attack the new Democratic speaker. Within a week after the first story, Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Bartow, the chairman of the Republican Conference and third-highest-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, said her request represented "an arrogance of office that just defies common sense" and called it "a major deviation from the previous speaker."
The editors point out that Tony Snow was forced to apologize for this attack on Nancy Pelosi.
The trouble is that the facts are not what The Washington Times reported. On Feb. 8, White House spokesman Tony Snow held a press conference after U.S. House Sergeant-At-Arms Bill Livingood issued a news release saying he, not Pelosi, asked for the larger plane. "The fact that Speaker Pelosi lives in California compelled me to request an aircraft that is capable of making nonstop flights for security purposes, unless such an aircraft is unavailable. … I regret that an issue that is exclusively considered and decided in a security context has evolved into a political issue."
Snow called the reporting of the military aircraft "a silly story, and I think it's been unfair to the speaker. … I think this is much ado about not a whole lot."
Then the editorial goes on to emphasive emphatically who owns the Washington Times...
Putnam evidently developed an admiration for the reporting in The Washington Times, founded in 1982 by Sun Myung Moon, leader of the Unification Church and the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification.
They point out that Putnam never verified the story, and that he never did apologize. The editors even point out that he blamed the reporters for "sloppy" reporting in not verifying their sources.
Putnam's arrogance is so like that of the president whom he worships. He is so vain he may not even know this editorial is about him, to paraphrase Carly Simon.
It certainly took the editors long enough to go after Putnam, but I still give them credit. They have given him way too many undeserved kudos.