Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else nervous with Waxman's decision to go to Syria with Pelosi?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 09:20 AM
Original message
Anyone else nervous with Waxman's decision to go to Syria with Pelosi?
Given all of the investigations underway, why is Waxman part of this delegation? Seems like he ought to stay here and focus on the domestic crimes front. We have plenty of talented people who could be part of Pelosi's delegation, but few who can do what Waxman is doing.

Perhaps I'm paranoid, but I could see how a Waxman assassination could be a two-fer for this administration. Getting a key Democrat off their backs and using this to galvanize American public opinion against the Syrians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, our Secret Service
is up to the task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But has the SS been politicized?
if DOJ has been stacked with Bushies, what is there to stop it spreading everywhere? I frankly was shocked to hear that Waxman was going. Put nothing past the criminals, nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I would feel safe to bet my first born
on the fact that the Secret Service is NOT political...EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. probably safer there than in DC.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have to admit that this news gave me a real tin-foil moment
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 11:07 AM by solara
Do we know for sure Waxman and Pelosi initiated the trip overseas? Are we sure they 'wanted' to go to Syria? It just seems so wrong.

Why does the idea that they were forced to go to Syria actually make sense to me? Why does it seem so logical that a cover story was released to purposefully make it 'look' as though they insisted on going there in spite of warnings from the White House?

The really sad thing is that these tin-foil thoughts seem far more plausible to me than the "official" story.

Geez I am definitely feeling paranoid...

:crazy:


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Odd that there was no pre-trip coverage.
I can't recall any mention of this trip before they were on the way. Seems like it was spur of the moment. I really don't know what purpose this trip could serve right now. There's little tangible action the Democrats can drive on ME policy right now. Certainly, Bush has no interest in having his turf encroached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep, yep it was a complete surprise to me and
and to most other people I think.....Ahhh well. I think I would feel a lot better if you had said "Naww. you are really reaching here"

Damn.


INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. For safety reasons, they usually keep trips to the Middle East pretty
quiet--when Senators and Reps go to Iraq, we usually don't hear about it until they return or after they've arrived there safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't share your tinfoil, but I don't see the reason for this trip either -
If Speaker Pelosi wants to travel abroad, why not visit one of our many democratic allies? Go to Germany, to France, to Britain, to Japan, heck, to Canada, go to a place where a free populace, free press and elected officials would welcome her with open arms as a sign that America might be getting back some sense again. Why go to visit a nasty little dictator? You just KNOW the righties are salivating for the images of Pelosi chit-chatting with Bashar in that reception room in Damascus with the too ornate and way-too-massive chairs and monumental coffee tables!

Bad visuals! Free and happy Frenchmen or Britons cheering Speaker Pelosi, wouldn't have to be that huge a crowd either, would be much better, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Democrats are Syria's "friends". Because they want US to discuss
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 11:40 AM by applegrove
Iraq with Syria and Iran. Syrians too will not let anything happen to Pelosi or Waxman. Not friends so much as more friendly to the Syrians that the Repukes and the Neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Plenty of time to talk..
Maybe Waxman intends to use the long flight to discuss tables, and what's on or not on them. Maybe he'll talk about exactly what he's uncovered so far in his various investigations, reveal evidence that hasn't been made public yet, talk about where he thinks the inquiries are leading and how high up the food chain they'll go.

As a result of spending a good amount of time with an actual hero and a man who's truly interested in doing the peoples' business, and getting a little payback into the bargain, maybe Pelosi will decide to behave like the leader of an OPPOSITION party, instead of continuing in her current role as yet another compliant DLC android.

Maybe..


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC