Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman Lays the Pressure on Rice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 07:44 PM
Original message
Waxman Lays the Pressure on Rice
http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2285/Waxman_Lays_the_Pressure_on_Rice

Waxman Lays the Pressure on Rice
Calls Info Supplied "Inadequate," Reasserts Request to Testify
By CHRISTINA DAVIDSON Posted 3 hr. 0 min. ago



Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, fired another pointed letter off to Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice on Monday, again demanding information regarding the fraudelent claim that Niger supplied uranium to Saddam Hussein.

Since assuming chairmanship of the oversight committee, Waxman has stepped up the pressure in examining pre-war manipulation of intelligence by Bush Administration officials. On March 12, Waxman forwarded a letter to Rice requesting information by March 23 about the Niger uranium claim in Bush's 2003 State of the Union speech.

The State Department never responded, and so on March 30 Waxman sent a request for her to answer the questions in testimony before his committee. On April 3 he received what he calls an "inadequate" response from Jeffrey Bergner assistant secretary for legislative affairs.

In his return letter to Rice, Waxman states:

I asked you to answer specific questions raised in a June 10, 2003, letter and a July 29,2003, 1etter, both of which I enclosed. These questions included: (1) whether you had any knowledge that would explain why President Bush cited forged evidence about Iraq's efforts to procure uranium from Niger in the State of the Union address; (2) whether you knew before the State of the Union address of the doubts raised by the CIA and the State Department about the veracity of the Niger claim; (3) whether there was a factual basis for your reference in a January 23,2003, op-ed to "Iraq's efforts to get uranium from abroad"; and (4) whether you took appropriate steps to investigate how the Niger claim ended up in the State of the Union address after it was revealed to be fraudulent.

Rather than address any of these questions, Mr. Bergner forwarded copies of two old State Department letters that have no bearing whatsoever on your knowledge of, your role in, or your statements about the Niger claim.

Mr. Bergner also failed to respond to the Committee's questions about the seemingly inconsistent way in which the White House has responded to leaks of classified information, such as the disclosure of the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson.


more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think I'd rather face an angry pitbull
than to have Waxman after me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Waxman will deserve a medal for his efforts.
Rice of course will make every effort to refuse to answer his questions. I still think that she is third on the list after Rove and Chaney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. demanding the Dr. Rice tell the truth and not filibuster innane ambiguities is a challenge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's the man. I'd like to see that CondOILeeza get nailed (in the bad
way, not the good way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. About time someone has, with the unqualified piece of Rice shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. very specific questions re: Congressional oversight--does the SoS recognize oversight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC