Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Independents now outnumber Dems and Repub.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:13 PM
Original message
Independents now outnumber Dems and Repub.
Twice now I have seen poll which indicates
more people are registering as Independent
or changing their registration to Independent?
The result is the number of Independents
exceeds that of Democrats or Republicans.


The latest poll on this--CNN, Friday.

Have any thoughts as to why this is happening?
Any ramifications? What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Youth. They're fed up and I don't blame them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Links to polls?? This would be absolutely new polling data, I'd love to see it. n/t
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I have notice some people who were the biggest cheerleaders for
Chucklenuts are now saying they are independent (at least two sons-in-law). I figured it was too embarrassing to publicly admit the rethuglican party is a bunch of crooks and liars. And while the Dems, who they have reviled for decades, have some pretty good answers to some problems they just can't abide the word liberal so they are taking a non-commitment commitment way out. For many backsliding rethuglicans it is a face saving move.

The ones who are really funny are the ones who try to convince you they have always been independent and not just since the rethuglicans have imploded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Do not have link--Wolf Blitzer and J. MCCaffrey

aternoon, Friday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seattleman Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many lies do you have to be told before you stop trusting
THE LIARS??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I First Registered, I Went Independent
it was Watergate, and I couldn't figure out who to believe.

But after a few years of Reagan, I committed to Democrats. I couldn't sit on the fence any longer. The tendency was clear.

I expect there'll be a lot more like me out of the next generations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Demeter,
It is interesting, I turned off on Regan also.

Regan was the first Republican I voted for
and the last. I did not vote for his
second term. That was when I really
learned truly intellectualized what
Republicans are all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. My guess would be that's proof that the poll #'s of congress
being in the low 20's and the Prez 3's in the high 20's or at the best very low 30's areactually RIGHT! Lots of people are displeased with the people now in office, and aren't happy with anyone they see running to replace them either.

Hell, I prefer the Dems to the Pubs, but in all honesty, there are many times I would rather be an independant too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. I have flirted with the idea of registering "I" myself, since my
husband has. He used to be an "R". Sometimes I am not proud to be a Dem, but usually it's where I feel I belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. OHdem10, I question the validity of your OP title, but this a great discussion.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does that mean that if Joe Lieberman runs for president in 2008
...he could win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I seriously doubt this poll.
In the previous presidential elections less than a third of voters were independents. In the area where I live which is mostly Republican there are virtually no independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You are free to doubt it---
There are times I doubt polls. I simply found it
interesting. Then thought if it is true, or false
it should make people think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Right, that's exactly what you thought.
:hi: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. In recent polling, they continue to hold that percentage. Not attributable. There are posters here
that believe it because perception of the public sector has been poisoned, thank you PNAC. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've known many people who claimed they were Independent
yet their voter registration showed them voting in Republican primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Me too! My next door neighbor claims he is an Indie but Iknow for a fact
that he is a registered Republican. When Iwas voluntering for Nd Lamont we went through voter regis. lists of Dems and Inds to find anyone we might know so we could have a pro Ned card from the campaign sent to them with our name on it. His didn't show up on either list. And I know he votes. My husband works the polls every election and there our neighbor is, voting every time! Big fat liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I say, sir, did you perhaps pull these numbers from the nether regions???
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. I've always been an unaffiliated voter
I can't understand why people register with any political party.

Why let them think they have your vote. Make them work for your vote.

Statistics say the independent active voters are more educated and have higher income.

Maybe we don't think any political party speaks for us and our beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. longest poll of party affiliation
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=727

I look with glee on the GOP affiliation falloff from Nixon. It took them 20 years to recover.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks for the thought provoking link.
:-) MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. thanks for the link!
I've been seeing this story for at least two days, but this is the first link I have seen to some real numbers.

it looks like the number of independents hasn't changed much in my lifetime. But the percentage of Democratic voters have remained below 40% since 1989. The good news is there are always more Democrats than Republicans, and Republicans have made up less than a third of the national vote since 1989.

at least we still have two active parties in our political system, but something tells me we won't see an effective third party for decades to come. I also believe that the era of one-party coalitions is over, the parties of Lincoln and FDR are only relics of an extinct political cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semass Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not surprising!
In bluer than blue Massachusetts Unenrolled(Independents) are about 50% of the registered voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. in california, new registrations running 40+% independent
average income of independents 2x the state average
younger, higher income, more urban

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. I know why its happening but not dare say.
But it's a combination of two things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Gary Hart saw this in the '80's
This has been going on since the 80’s. Gary Hart recognized that FDR’s New Deal coalition was falling apart. Many of Hart’s “new ideas” were intended to appeal to Independents and moderate Repukes without changing the core progressive principles of the party. Many of the “old bulls” in Congress didn’t want to change anything, since any kind of change might threaten their fiefdoms in Congress.

Clintonism with its triangulation and corporatism was solely tactical. Clinton never did anything to rebuild the party. Thus, under Clinton the party lost the House for the first time since Eisenhower was President. We are still rebuilding.

:kick: HART 2008! :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's a waypoint on the way from Republican to Democrat.
It's much easier for a reformed pidgeon (non-rich ex-Republican) to become an Independent than to go straight Dem. All that matters is how they vote, and they are voting Dem right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. In NC
We have several counties where Unaffiliated is the second party. This is applicable in counties where Democrats hold the lead as well as a couple where Republics hold the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC