Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Got To Admit It...(Biden)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:50 AM
Original message
I Got To Admit It...(Biden)
From MTP...

Senator Mastercard is doing pretty well on MTP. I like the way he calls upon facts and references with such ease. He is very articulate. Of that, there is no doubt.

Okay...so he's got an ego. When you think about it, I wouldn't want a President that didn't have an ego. Joe likes Joe...I'm starting to like him too.

Does he have a shot?

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. No.
I tend to find him dislikeable, but I can't put my finger on why ... too 'happy to be him', I guess.

Oh, and the hairdo grosses me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. he's ok
I make fun of him alot for going on all the shows every 5 minutes, but Joe is an interesting guy to listen to from time to time. He talks alot but I don't ever find him boring. He's an articulate guy, usually very well-prepared too.

I would say he doesn't have much of a shot. I think his best shot would have been 4 years ago. He missed out on that. Still, that would have been tough for him even then.

I have a big ego myself, so I don't judge Joe too much on that one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. OJ Joe, that's what we call him at our house. Will sell anyone, any story, anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's all bark and no bite
All sizzle and no steak.

And when it really counts -- when he actually has to cast a vote -- he frequently goes the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with those who say he's running for Secretary of State. And he has a shot there.
He's one of the sharpest foreign policy Senators in that chamber.

He'd also have a shot being an East Coast balance to a ticket headed up by Richardson (though right now, that looks unlikely...but then, it's early days still! Things have a way of changing when we least expect it).

I do think his brain surgery would be an issue if he had a real shot at the top spot--unfairly, yes. But it would be shopped around by the corporate media, because that's what they do.

And his ego, and his hair plugs, and the Neil Kinnock thing....that's all a lot of fodder. They'd use it, it's what they do. All those scandals happened before the "24 hour news cycle" really took off, so they didn't get beaten to death as much as they could have. They're a fresh sparring partner for those looking for dirt--and we know the corporate media isn't enamoured of changing the party in charge, it screws up their war profiteering profit margins...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Huh??
"He's one of the sharpest foreign policy Senators in that chamber."

I think that says more about the Chamber than about Joe's sharpness.

He's just another bland expression of lowest-common-denominator policy consensus. When it comes to "sharp" the guy's a non-starter.

What the heck's sharp about him? What qualifies him for State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, Dave, it's clear your mileage does vary.
I've found that he's often the only one that actually seems to have examined, for comprehension, the history of the non-American nation under discussion. He understands the background of conflicts, and the interrelationships between nations that predate a conflict. He even understands things like religious and economic interests that seem to escape the so-called "experts" who are nothing more than well-paid GOP loyalists who have read half of the CIA Country Study, and then put it down in favor of a Faux News expose.

And this isn't a new skillset, by any means. He's been like that since the Kinnock business, decades ago. He's also been on the Foreign Relations committee for some time (he is chair, now) and has always done his homework.

But I get it--you don't like the guy. Fine, that's your perogative.

He's not my first choice, yet, anyway (I remain undecided amongst the field of very good Dems thus far) but I'm not going to pile on about him because I just don't find him all that awful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. I certainly hope not.
Biden is charismatic but you really need to listen and analyze what he is saying. Not good. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I listened to him this a.m. and thought he was right on about all the issues
he discussed. He was given time to explain his views and there wasn't one thing I disagreed with. True, I am no brainstein. He has charisma, seems sincere, apologetic about his change of views on different issues like abortion, explained the lead up to the war and why he voted on the IWR (?) and also mentioned that the world was edging towards doing away with the sanctions against iraq and the dangers there. He said we needed inspectors back in the country to verify whether he had evil weapons or not. George pulled the inspectors out before they were finished going to all the areas that the bushies declared were hidden weapons sites, one of many jokes from the bushies (north, south, east & west of Baghdad)!!

Clinton and Obama appear to be the "chosen" ones by the media. That scares me. Not that I find either of those candidate unelectable, just that I want to feel like the masses count, not the media's opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry...that was the funniest post of the young day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Arranged and rated 10 top to 1 bottom, every one who voted
Edited on Sun Apr-29-07 11:31 AM by higher class
for 'whatever they claim to have voted for' are all sharing number 1. They will hold that position. I'm unforgiving on shock and awe, torment, torture, arrogance, pillaging, plundering, massacreing, and running up untold debt. I don't support imperialism. I support the court system for crime against the citizens which was what 9-11 was - a criminal act (just like the first bombing). Which of the candidates called for or presented a bill to treat 9-11 as a criminal act?

People on the internet KNEW what was going on. All of them must not have had access to the internet.

I repeat:
Wellstone
First vote in the Senate - against Iraq War 1.
Last vote in the Senate - against Iraq War 2

Feingold:
Only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is very articulate
and clean!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Do you really believe Biden meant whether he bathed or not?
I have used the word clean to mean many things, such as a clean record. How about the term, clean and crisp?

Where is the rage when Rudy says the Dems will be to blame if they are elected and we are attacked? George has used this for years and the media barely touches on the stupidity of that comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. why do you assume I meant that?

Do you really believe Biden meant whether he bathed or not?

It was a joke, get over ot.

Where is the rage when Rudy says the Dems will be to blame if they are elected and we are attacked? George has used this for years and the media barely touches on the stupidity of that comment.

Actually, there has been more than a little outrage. Olberman, Dean, and Hart, to mention a few ... and I have been and still am as I have vented in more appropriate places. I believe this thread was about Biden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-29-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. If he can raise more money, he has a shot.
So contribute :)

Seriously, I have heard throught the grapevine that when and if he raises more money his campaign will be in full swing.

As you can imagine with him and the rest on the 'lower tier' they have to spend wisely to compete. Biden only raised 3 million, which should be good but not in today's standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC