Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goodling pushed out career officials.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:51 AM
Original message
Goodling pushed out career officials.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/goodling-pushed-out-career-officials/

Goodling pushed out career officials.

The Los Angeles Times notes that Monica Goodling’s tenure at the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys “appears to have been crucial to facilitating the plan to fire U.S. attorneys. Former colleagues said that she prevailed upon the head of the office, Michael A. Battle, to replace two long-serving officials who probably would have viewed the firing of prosecutors without cause as highly suspicious, and helped install a fellow Regent law school graduate as a replacement.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. All that authority, all that responsibility
Given to a woman with the memory skills of a strikingly dull cocker spaniel.

If I were on the committee, I'd insist on lead-off questioning, and just walk back through her resume and experience that landed her in such an important position. Who hired her? Who recommended her? Who were her references? What questions was she asked during her interview? What wealth of experience and broadness of knowledge did she bring to her job? Could you please tell us about the most significant event in your life up until you were hired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good point; point out her total LACK of experience, and then wonder
Edited on Wed May-23-07 10:17 AM by babylonsister
what she was doing there to begin with.

Edit to add, someone's doing that very thing right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excuse me? Wasn't that her "boyfriend" that she installed?
Typical airhead - like EH who just went OFF on Rosie on the VIEW.

****Prediction: Rosie will not be back after today just as Star was not permitted to return to work out the end of her commitment.****
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hmmm. I saw another thread about Behar going off; sounds like a fun
day on ABC. Sorry I missed it, but will look for the video later today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. God, Elizabeth was the most vicious I have ever seen her. Of course
WaWa will stick up for her and can Rosie (I believe).

Joy began with a takedown of * but then Elizabeth kept interrupting her. Rosie was silent for quite a bit of it. But Elizabeth continued and struck a nerve with Rosie and drew her into it. I cannot quote their words, it was fast and furious. Hope you can catch it later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. She's been described as a real perfectionist
I'd, again, walk back through her testimony; all the "I don't knows" and "I don't recalls" and ask her if she would think that was satisfactory if a subordinate of hers gave her those answers? Is that as much as you asked from your staff, performance-wise? Was it sufficient for them to be good persons, or did they have to do a competent job, as well? What would you have said to someone in your office who gave such lame answers, and why isn't it fair to apply that standard to you? After all, it's possible to surprise someone at work with a question; you've had days to prepare for your testimony here today. Have there been any "surprising" questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC